13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 14.12 Some applications of<br />

cable bolts around open stopes (after<br />

Lappalainen <strong>and</strong> Antikainen, 1987).<br />

ARTIFICIALLY SUPPORTED MINING METHODS<br />

the liquefaction potential of paste fills with different cement contents. The different<br />

performance <strong>and</strong> design criteria for primary <strong>and</strong> secondary stope fills are reflected in<br />

the fill composition. The primary stope fill requires 5% cement addition in the paste fill<br />

to provide stable fill exposures up to 40 high <strong>and</strong> 100 m long. For the secondary stope<br />

fill, a minimum of 1% cement is required to minimize the potential for liquefaction.<br />

14.6 Reinforcement of open stope walls<br />

Several well-executed investigations have demonstrated the performance <strong>and</strong> benefit<br />

of cable reinforcement of stope boundaries. These include test stopes at the Homestake<br />

Mine (Donovan et al., 1984), <strong>and</strong> several Australian mines (Thompson et al.,<br />

1987). The evaluation of several cable bolt reinforcement patterns in stopes at the<br />

Pyhasalmi Mine, Finl<strong>and</strong>, reported by Lappalainen <strong>and</strong> Antikainen (1987) is illustrated<br />

in Figure 14.12. The materials <strong>and</strong> practices used in such large-scale reinforcement<br />

have been described in Chapter 11.<br />

In order to assess the relative effectiveness of various stope wall reinforcement<br />

designs, the finite difference method of analysis of reinforcement mechanics described<br />

in Chapter 11 has been used by Brady <strong>and</strong> Lorig (1988) to analyse hangingwall<br />

reinforcement in an inclined open stope, as shown in Figure 14.13a. The stope<br />

resembles that mined in the field reinforcement trial described by Greenelsh (1985). In<br />

Figures 14.13c <strong>and</strong> 14.13d, the designs were based on a constant 150 m of tendon<br />

for each reinforcement pattern, so that any differences in performance may reflect the<br />

intrinsic effectiveness of the pattern. The design in Figure 14.13e required 200 m of<br />

reinforcement.<br />

Assessment of the relative effectiveness of the various patterns is indicated by the<br />

degrees of control exercised at the hangingwall surface by the reinforcement. The<br />

plots of hangingwall deflection for the reinforcement conditions indicated in Figures<br />

428

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!