Chronologische - Ethikseite

2010 [69] Baxley, Anne Margaret (2010): The Aesthetics of Morality: Schiller’s Critique of Kantian
Rationalism, Philosophy Compass 5, S. 1084–95.
2010 [70] Baxley, Anne Margaret (2010): Kant‘s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy, Cambridge.
– Vgl. Dazu [41].
2010 [71] Carson, Thomas L. (2010): Lying and Deception, Oxford, S. 67–88 (“Kant and the Absolute
Prohibition against Lying”).
2010 [72] Deigh, John (2010): An Introduction to Ethics, Cambridge, S. 140–56 (“Kant’s way”,
“Formalism in Ethics”, “The problem with Kant’s formalism”).
2010 [73] Denis, Lara (2010): Humanity, Obligation, and the Good Will: An Argument against Dean’s
Interpretation of Humanity, Kantian Review 15, S. 118–41.
2010 [74] Denis, Lara (2010): Freedom, Primacy, and Perfect Duties to Oneself, in Kant’s Metaphysics
of Morals. A Critical Guide, hrsg. von Lara Denis, Cambridge, S. 170–91.
2010 [75] Denis, Lara (Hrsg.) (2010): Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide, Cambridge.
2010 [76] Engstrom, Stephen (2010): Reason, Desire, and the Will, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A
Critical Guide, hrsg. von Lara Denis, Cambridge, S. 28–50.
2010 [77] Engstrom, Stephen (2010): The Triebfeder of Pure Practical Reason, in Kant’s Critique of
Practical Reason. A Critical Guide, hrsg. von Andrews Reath und Jens Timmermann,
Cambridge, S. 90–118.
2010 [78] Fahmy, Melissa Seymour (2010): Kantian Practical Love, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91,
S. 313–31. 26
2010 [79] Flikschuh, Katrin (2010): Justice without Virtue, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical
Guide, hrsg. von Lara Denis, Cambridge, S. 51–70.
2010 [80] Formosa, Paul (2010): Kant on the Highest Moral-Physical Good: The Social Aspect of Kant’s
Moral Philosophy, Kantian Review 15, S. 1–36.
2010 [81] Gasché, Rodolphe (2010): A Material A Priori? On Max Scheler’s Critique Of Kant’s Formal
Ethics, Philosophical Forum 41, S. 113–26. – Dazu: Kosch, Michelle (2010): Gasché
on Scheler, Philosophical Forum 41, S. 127–30.
2010 [82] Geiger, Ido (2010): What is the Use of the Universal Law Formula of the Categorical
Imperative?, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18, S. 271–295.
2010 [83] Grenberg, Jeanine (2010): What is the Enemy of Virtue?, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A
considering it in the light of a number of criticisms that are commonly levelled at the section. In conclusion,
the article proposes that this interpretation of the section also has significant implications for the
understanding of Kant’s method, his formulas and his basic conception of the ‘moral’.”
26 “In the Doctrine of Virtue Kant stipulates that ‘Love is a matter of feeling, not of willing . . . so a duty to
love is an absurdity.’ Nonetheless, in the same work Kant claims that we have duties of love to other human
beings. According to Kant, the kind of love which is commanded by duty is practical love. This paper
defends the view that the duty of practical love articulated in the Doctrine of Virtue is distinct from the duty
of beneficence and best understood as a duty of self-transformation, which agents observe by cultivating a
benevolent disposition and practical beneficent desires.”