Chronologische - Ethikseite

S. 485–502. 132
2002 [552] Lawrence, Joseph P. (2002): Radical Evil and Kant’s Turn to Religion, Journal of Value
Inquiry 36, S. 319–35.
2002 [553] Leyva, Gustavo (2002): Notizen zur neueren Rezeption der kantischen Ethik in der angloamerikanischen
Philosophie, Philosophische Rundschau 49, S. 290–304.
2002 [554] Ludwig, Bernd (2002): Whence Public Right? The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning
in Kant’s Doctrine of Right, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays,
hrsg. von Mark Timmons, Oxford, S. 159–84.
2002 [555] Makkreel, Rudolf A. (2002): Reflective Judgment and the Problem of Assessing Virtue in
Kant, Journal of Value Inquiry 36, S. 205–20.
2002 [556] Melnick, Arthur (2002): Kant’s Formulations of the Categorical Imperative, Kant-Studien 93,
S. 291–308. Wiederabgedruckt in Melnick, Themes in Kant’s Metaphysics and Ethics,
Washington, D.C. 2004, S. 229–48.
2002 [557] Munzel, G. Felicitas (2002): “Doctrine of Method” and “Closing” (151–163), in Immanuel
Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, hrsg. von Otfried Höffe, Berlin, S. 203–17.
2002 [558] O’Neill, Onora (2002): Instituting Principles: Between Duty and Action, in Kant’s
Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, hrsg. von Mark Timmons, Oxford, S.
331–48.
2002 [559] O’Neill, Onora (2002): Autonomy and the Fact of Reason in the Kritik der praktischen
Vernunft (§§ 7–8, 30–41), in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, hrsg.
von Otfried Höffe, Berlin, S. 81–97.
2002 [560] Paley, John (2002): Virtues of Autonomy: The Kantian Ethics of Care, Nursing Philosophy: An
International Journal for Healthcare Professionals 3, S. 133–143.
2002 [561] Pasternack, Lawrence (2002): Intrinsic Value and Moral Overridingness in Kant’s
Groundwork, Southwest Philosophy Review 18, S. 113–121.
2002 [562] Pieper, Annemarie (2002): Zweites Hauptstück (57–71), in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen
Vernunft, hrsg. von Otfried Höffe, Berlin, S. 115–33. – ‘On the Concept of an
Object of Pure Practical Reason’ (Chapter 2 of the Analytic of Practical Reason), in
Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy, hrsg. von Karl Ameriks und Otfried Höffe,
Cambridge 2009, S. 179–97.
2002 [563] Pogge, Thomas W. (2002): Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?, in Kant’s
Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative Essays, hrsg. von Mark Timmons, Oxford, S.
133–58.
132 “Here are two widespread responses to Kant’s categorical imperative. On one hand, one might note the
absence of detailed rational derivation. On the other hand, even someone who maintains some skepticism is
likely to have a sense that (nevertheless) there is something to Kant’s central ideas. The recommended
solution is analysis of elements of the categorical imperative. Their appeal turns out to have different
sources. One aspect of the first formulation rests on the logic of normative utterances. But others can be
justified only in terms of their contributions to desirable functionings of a moral order.”