Chronologische - Ethikseite

2000 [677] Rawls, John (2000): Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, hrsg. von Barbara Herman,
Cambridge, Mass, S. 143–325. – Geschichte der Moralphilosophie. Hume – Leibniz –
Kant – Hegel, hrsg. von Barbara Herman, Frankfurt a. M. 2002, S. 199–421.
2000 [678] Rescher, Nicholas (2000): On the Reach of Pure Reason in Kant’s Practical Philosophy, in
ders., Kant and the Reach of Pure Reason. Studies in Kant’s Theory of Rational
Systematization, Cambridge, S. 188–99.
2000 [679] Rescher, Nicholas (2000): On the Rationale of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, in ders., Kant
and the Reach of Pure Reason. Studies in Kant’s Theory of Rational Systematization,
Cambridge, S. 200–29.
2000 [680] Rescher, Nicholas (2000): On the Unity of Kant’s Categorical Imperative, in ders., Kant and
the Reach of Pure Reason. Studies in Kant’s Theory of Rational Systematization,
Cambridge, S. 230–47.
2000 [681] Schaller, Walter E. (2000): Kant on Right and Moral Rights, Southern Journal of Philosophy
38, S. 321–42.
2000 [682] Senn, Marcel (2000): Ethik und Recht bei Kant und Spinoza, in Zur Aktualität der Ethik
Spinozas. hrsg. von Klaus Hammacher, Irmela Reimers-Tovote und Manfred Walther,
Würzburg S. 279–316.
2000 [683] Simon, Josef (2000): Moral bei Kant und Nietzsche, Nietzsche-Studien 29, S. 178–198.
2000 [684] Stratton-Lake, Philip (2000): Kant, Duty and Moral Worth, London. 139
2000 [685] Taylor, Richard (2000): Good and Evil, Amherst, S. 139–56 (“Kantian Morality”).
2000 [686] Timmermann, Jens (2000): Kant’s Puzzling Ethics of Maxims, Harvard Review of Philosophy
8, S. 39–52.
2000 [687] Timmermann, Jens (2000): Kant und die Lüge aus Pflicht. Zur Auflösung moralischer
Dilemmata in einer kantischen Ethik, Philosophisches Jahrbuch 107, S. 267–283.
2000 [688] Weiper, Susanne (2000): Triebfeder und höchstes Gut. Untersuchungen zum Problem der sittlichen
Motivation bei Kant, Schopenhauer und Scheler, Würzburg.
2000 [689] Wood, Allen W. (2000): Kant’s Practical Philosophy, in The Cambridge Companion to
German Idealism, hrsg. von Karl Ameriks, S. 57–75.
1999 [690] Berkowitz, Peter (1999): Virtue and the Making of Modern Liberalism, Princeton, S. 106–33
(“Kant: Virtue within the Limits of Reason Alone”).
1999 [691] Cunningham, Anthony (1999): Kantian Ethics and Intimate Attachments, American
Philosophical Quarterly 36, S. 279–94.
139 “An examination of Kant’s account of moral worth. The debate over whether or not Kant said moral actions
have worth only if they are carried out from duty or whether actions carried out from mixed motives can be
good is complex and lies at the heart of Kant’s philosophy. Philip Stratton-Lake offers an account of acting
from duty which utilizes the distinction between primary and secondary motives. He maintains that the
moral law should not be understood as normative moral reason but as playing a transcendental role. Thus, a
Kantian account of moral worth is one where the virtuous agent is one who is responsive to concrete
particular considerations whilst preserving an essential role for universal moral principles.”