Chronologische - Ethikseite

2003 [511] Werner, Micha H. (2003): Diskursethik als Maximenethik. Von der Prinzipienbegründung zur
Handlungsorientierung, Würzbürg, S. 102–50 („‚Anwendungsprobleme’ der Ethik
Kants“).
2003 [512] Wittwer, Héctor (2003): Über einige Voraussetzungen und Ergebnisse der Ethik Kants,
Philosophisches Jahrbuch 110, S. 23–45.
2002 [513] Allison, Henry E. (2002): On the Very Idea of a Propensity to Evil, Journal of Value Inquiry
36, S. 337–48.
2002 [514] Ameriks, Karl (2002): “Pure Reason of Itself Alone Suffices to Determine the Will” (42–57),
in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, hrsg. von Otfried Höffe, Berlin, S.
99–114. Wiederabgedruckt in Ameriks, Interpreting Kant’s Critiques, Oxford 2003,
S. 249–61.
2002 [515] Baron, Marcia W. (2002): Love and Respect in the Doctrine of Virtue, in Kant’s Metaphysics
of Morals. Interpretative Essays, hrsg. von Mark Timmons, Oxford, S. 391–408.
2002 [516] Baron, Marcia (2002): Acting from Duty, in Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics
of Morals, edited and translated by Allen W. Wood. With Essays by J. B. Schneewind,
Marica Baron, Shelly Kagan, Allen W. Wood, New Haven 2002, S. 92–110. –
Handeln aus Pflicht, in Kants Ethik, hrsg. von Karl Ameriks und Dieter Sturma,
Paderborn 2004, S. 80–97.
2002 [517] Brandt, Reinhard (2002): „Kritische Beleuchtung der Analytik der reinen praktischen
Vernunft“ (89–106), in Immanuel Kant, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft, hrsg. von
Otfried Höffe, Berlin, S. 153–72.
2002 [518] Brewer, Talbot (2002): Maxims and Virtues, Philosophical Review 111, S. 539–72.
2002 [519] Brewer, Talbot (2002): The Character of Temptation: Towards a More Plausible Kantian
Moral Psychology, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83, S. 103–30. 131
2002 [520] Byrd, B. Sharon (2002): Kant’s Theory of Contract, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. Interpretative
Essays, hrsg. von Mark Timmons, Oxford, S. 111–32.
2002 [521] Cicovacki, Predrag (2002): Introduction: Kant’s Practical Philosophy Today, Journal of Value
Inquiry 36, S. 151–159.
2002 [522] Cicovacki, Predrag (2002): The Illusory Fabric of Kant’s True Morality, Journal of Value
Inquiry 36, S. 383–99.
2002 [523] Deligiorgi, Katerina (2002): Universalisability, Publicity, and Communication: Kant’s
Conception of Reason, European Journal of Philosophy 10, S. 143–159.
131 “Kant maintained that dutiful action can have the fullest measure of moral worth even if chosen in the face
of powerful inclinations to act immorally, and indeed that opposing inclinations only highlight the worth of
the action. I argue that this conclusion rests on an implausibly mechanistic account of desires, and that
many desires are constituted by tendencies to see certain features of one’s circumstances as reasons to
perform one or another action. I try to show that inclinations to violate moral requirements sometimes
manifest a morally objectionable half-heartedness in one’s commitment to those very requirements, and – by
extension – to the values that undergird these requirements.”