Chronologische - Ethikseite
Chronologische - Ethikseite
Chronologische - Ethikseite
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
und Ethik 5, S. 205–227.<br />
1997 [798] Wilson, Holly L. (1997): Kant’s Integration of Morality and Anthropology, Kant-Studien 88, S.<br />
87–104.<br />
1997 [799] Wood, Allen W. (1997): The Final Form of Kant’s Practical Philosophy, in Spindel<br />
Conference 1997 on Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, hrsg. von Nelson Potter und Mark<br />
Timmons (Southern Journal of Philosophy Vol. 36, Supplement), Memphis, S. 1–20<br />
(dazu: Paul Guyer, Comments: Justice and Morality, S. 21–28).<br />
1996 [800] Annas, Julia (1996): Aristotle and Kant on Morality and Practical Reasoning, in Aristotle,<br />
Kant, and the Stoics. Rethinking Happiness and Duty, hrsg. von Stephen Engstrom<br />
und Jennifer Whiting, Cambridge, S. 237–58.<br />
1996 [801] Cummiskey, David (1996): Kantian Consequentialism, New York, Oxford. – Vgl. dazu:<br />
Dean, Richard (2000): Cummiskey’s Kantian Consequentialism, Utilitas 12, S. 25–<br />
40; Weinstock, Daniel M. (2000): Critical Notice of David Cummiskey, Kantian<br />
Consequentialism, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 30, S. 315–39; Wolf, Jean-Claude<br />
(2000): Rezension von David Cummiskey, Kantian Consequentialism, Kant-Studien<br />
91, S. 507–11.<br />
1996 [802] Dean, Richard (1996): What Should We Treat as an End in Itself?, Pacific Philosophical<br />
Quarterly 77, S. 268–88.<br />
1996 [803] Engstrom, Stephen (1996): Happiness and the Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, in<br />
Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics. Rethinking Happiness and Duty, hrsg. von Stephen<br />
Engstrom und Jennifer Whiting, Cambridge, S. 102–38.<br />
1996 [804] Engstrom, Stephen/Whiting, Jennifer (Hrsg.) (1996): Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics.<br />
Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge.<br />
1996 [805] Guyer, Paul (1996): The Value of Agency. Review Essay of Barbara Herman, The Practice of<br />
Moral Judgment, Ethics 106, S. 404–23. – Zu [886].<br />
1996 [806] Herman, Barbara (1996): Making Room for Character, in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics.<br />
Rethinking Happiness and Duty, hrsg. von Stephen Engstrom und Jennifer<br />
Whiting, Cambridge, S. 36–60. Revidierte Version in Herman, Moral Literacy,<br />
Cambridge, Mass. 2007, S. 1–28.<br />
1996 [807] Hill, Jr., Thomas E. (1996): Moral Dilemmas, Gaps, and Residues: A Kantian Perspective, in<br />
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Theory, hrsg. von H. E. Mason, Oxford, S. 167–98.<br />
1996 [808] Hill, Jr., Thomas E. (1996): Is a Good Will Overrated?, Midwest Studies in Philosophy Volume<br />
20: Moral Concepts, hrsg. von Peter French, Theodore E. Uehling und Howard<br />
Wettstein, Notre Dame, S. 299–317. Wiederabgedruckt in Hill, Human Welfare and<br />
Moral Worth. Kantian Perspectives, Oxford 2002, S. 37–60.<br />
1996 [809] Hiltscher, Reinhard (1996): Zur systematischen Stellung des Bösen in Kants Moralphilosophie,<br />
in Wahrheit und Geltung. Festschrift für Werner Flach, hrsg. von Alexander Riebel<br />
und Reinhard Hiltscher, Würzburg, S. 85–117.<br />
1996 [810] Irwin, T. H. (1996): Kant’s Criticisms of Eudaemonism, in Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics.<br />
Rethinking Happiness and Duty, hrsg. von Stephen Engstrom und Jennifer