Chronologische - Ethikseite

2006 [319] Driver, Julia (2006): Ethics. The Fundamentals, Oxford, S. 80–101.
2006 [320] Dunn, Robert (2006): Values and the Reflective Point of View. On Expressivism, Self-
Knowledge and Agency, Aldershot, S. 107–24.
2006 [321] Duttge, Gunnar/Löwe, Michael (2006): Das Absolute im Recht. Epilegomena zur deontologischen
Legitimation abwägungsfreier Rechtsgehalte, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik
14, hrsg. von B. Sharon Byrd, Joachim Hruschka und Jan C. Joerden, S. 351–84.
2006 [322] Fröhlich, Günter (2006): Nachdenken über das Gute. Ethische Positionen bei Aristoteles,
Cicero, Kant, Mill und Scheler, Göttingen, S. 69–102 („Kant und der Kategorische
Imperativ“).
2006 [323] Fulda, Hans Friedrich (2006): Notwendigkeit des Rechts unter Voraussetzung des Kategorischen
Imperativs der Sittlichkeit, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 14, hrsg. von B.
Sharon Byrd, Joachim Hruschka und Jan C. Joerden, S. 167–213.
2006 [324] Gardner, Sebastian (2006): The Primacy of Practical Reason, in A Companion to Kant, hrsg.
von Graham Bird, Oxford, S. 259–74.
2006 [325] Geismann, Georg (2006): Recht und Moral in der Philosophie Kants, Jahrbuch für Recht und
Ethik 14, hrsg. von B. Sharon Byrd, Joachim Hruschka und Jan C. Joerden, S. 3–124.
2006 [326] Gerhardt, Volker (2006): Menschheit in meiner Person. Exposé zu einer Theorie des exemplarischen
Handelns, Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 14, hrsg. von B. Sharon Byrd,
Joachim Hruschka und Jan C. Joerden, S. 215–24.
2006 [327] Gilabert, Pablo (2006): Considerations on the Notion of Moral Validity in the Moral Theories
of Kant and Habermas, Kant-Studien 97, S. 210–27. 94
2006 [328] González Valenzuela, Juliana (2006): Kant’s Ethics and its Influence on Bioethics, in Kant
Today – Kant aujourd'hui – Kant heute. Results of the IIP Conference/Actes des
Entretiens de l'Institut International de Philosophie Karlsruhe/Heidelberg 2004, hrsg.
von Hans Lenk und Reiner Wiehl, Münster, S. 127–41.
2006 [329] Hare, John E. (2006): On Recognizing our Duties as God’s Commands, in Moralische
Contents: I. Good Will as an End in Itself. 1 Introduction. 2 What should we treat as an end in itself? 3 The
good will reading meshes with major ideas of Kant’s ethics. 4 The textual dispute, and arguments in favour
of minimal readings. 5 Is the good will reading just too hard to swallow? II. The Humanity Formulation as a
Moral Principle. 6 The argument for the humanity formula. 7 How duties follow from the categorical
imperative. 8 Kantian value, beneficence, and consequentialism. 9 Non-human animals, humanity, and the
kingdom of ends. 10 Would Kant say we should respect moral autonomy? 11 Autonomy as an end in itself?
12 Some big pictures.”
94 “In what follows I will consider Kant's and Habermas’s conceptions of moral validity in a comparative and
critical way. First, I will reconstruct Habermas's discursive or deliberative reformulation of Kant’s moral
theory (sec.1). And, second, I will introduce some comparative critical considerations (2). I will contend
that, though much is gained with Habermas’s intersubjectivist reformulation of Kant’s moral philosophy,
some problems emerge that could be treated with the help of certain Kantian insights. I will focus on Kant’s
and Habermas’s strictly moral writings. The issue of political validity or legitimacy (i.e., of the validity of
norms that are to be enforced by a coercive state apparatus) is of course of great importance, but I will not
address it here.”