23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

152 P. Harris and A. T. S. Wilkinson<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> seed<br />

production by<br />

attacked and<br />

unattacked plants<br />

Recommendations<br />

Literature Cited<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> head size on seed production in the attacked plants is nullified because<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> U. sty/ala also increases with head size (Equation 5, Table 36). The mean<br />

number <strong>of</strong> larvae per head was considerably lower than the maximum number in the<br />

heads <strong>of</strong> each size (Equation 6, Table 36). Thus for a head with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 14 mm the<br />

average number from the regression was 6.6 larvae while the maximum was 14.6 larvae.<br />

Thus the larval population is well below the physical limits <strong>of</strong> the thistle heads. There<br />

was a rather small effect <strong>of</strong> crowding on larval weight. A regression <strong>of</strong> live weight <strong>of</strong> 980<br />

larvae from heads with 1-33 larvae in a gall showed that one larva per gall averaged 9.4<br />

mg compared with 6.7 mg for those in heads with 33 larvae. The slope <strong>of</strong> the regression is<br />

highly significant, although as indicated by the small correlation coefficient there was a<br />

large variation in larval weights at all densities (Equation 7, Table 36). For the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

the calculations in this paper the size and hence the effect <strong>of</strong> a larva was assumed to be<br />

the same whether it was single or crowded.<br />

(a) Methods<br />

Seed production for each head on the unattacked plants was determined from regression<br />

Equation 3 (Table 36). These were summed and the total for each plant regressed on<br />

plant weight so that average production could be determined for a plant <strong>of</strong> any size. The<br />

same was done for the attacked plants except that the heads were assumed to produce 62<br />

seeds regardless <strong>of</strong> size.<br />

(b) Results<br />

The production <strong>of</strong> 4398 seeds for a plant <strong>of</strong> 75 g (Equation 10, Table 36), is close to the<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> 4000 seeds/plant given by Salisbury (1964) for the thistle in Britain. The attacked<br />

plant <strong>of</strong> this size produced 1898 seeds (Equation 11, Table 36), a reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

57%. For a plant <strong>of</strong> 150 g, the reduction was 62%.<br />

The calculations were made for a U. Sly/ala population infesting 88% <strong>of</strong> the thistle<br />

heads. This is slightly below the population plateau at Cloverdale, so the reduction in<br />

plump seed production at this site should be at least 60%. If the difference in the germination<br />

between attacked and unattacked plants is accepted, the reduction is over 65%.<br />

Under field conditions germination and seedling survival seem to depend on breaks in<br />

the sward rather than competition within the C. vulgare population. This means that the<br />

reduction in thistle density should be similar to the reduction <strong>of</strong> seed as soon as the soil<br />

seed-bank has reached its new equilibrium.<br />

(1) U. stylala should be distributed to sites across <strong>Canada</strong> with stable populations <strong>of</strong><br />

C. vulgare; but there is little point in releasing it against temporary outbreaks.<br />

(2) The introduction <strong>of</strong> additional biological control agents does not appear to be<br />

warranted as most <strong>of</strong> the problems with C. vulgare are either temporary following the<br />

clearing <strong>of</strong> land or the result <strong>of</strong> poor farming practice.<br />

Anderson. R.N. (1968) Germination and establishment <strong>of</strong> weeds for experimental purposes. Weed Science <strong>Society</strong> <strong>of</strong> America, 636 pp.<br />

Harrington. J.F. (1972) Seed storage and longevity. In: Kozlowski T.T. (Ed.) Seed biology vol. III. Academic Press. pp. 145-245.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!