pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Biological control <strong>of</strong>forest insect pests 219<br />
<strong>of</strong> pest outbreaks (examples are treatments to control M. disstria and L. dispar) ,<br />
whereas in most other cases the bacterium was applied with aerial sprays (examples<br />
here include attempted control <strong>of</strong> C. fumiferana, C. occidentalis, and O.<br />
pseudotsugata). Most development <strong>of</strong> aerial spraying <strong>of</strong> B.t. was conducted with C.<br />
fumiferana. Both water-based and oil-based formulations were used and the spray<br />
aircraft included fixed-wing aircraft equipped with from one to four engines, and<br />
various sizes <strong>of</strong> helicopters. Areas treated ranged as high as 90 000 ha, and in all cases<br />
results to a large extent depended on the application techniques that were employed.<br />
The time period during which B.t. can be applied during the insects' development is<br />
shorter than that permissible with chemical insecticides because the bacterium must be<br />
ingested to be effective whereas the standard chemical insecticides are neurotoxins and<br />
exhibit contact toxicity. An interesting international aspect <strong>of</strong> this work involved cooperative<br />
trials between <strong>Canada</strong> and the United States under the 6-year CAN USA<br />
Spruce Budworms Research Programme that started in 1977. The two countries also cooperated<br />
in one trial using B.t. against O. pseudotsugala in British Columbia.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> viruses, particularly baculoviruses, for control <strong>of</strong> forest insect pests has<br />
progressed rapidly since the last review, and Morris (1980) provides a convenient<br />
tabulaton <strong>of</strong> all field tests where either ground or aerial applications <strong>of</strong> virus were used.<br />
Most attention has been focused on the neodiprionid sawflies because NPVs that attack<br />
these sawflies were found to be particularly virulent. Many sawflies also feed colonially,<br />
which facilitates cross infection, and some <strong>of</strong> the viruses spread from the point <strong>of</strong><br />
infection, thus allowing spot introductions <strong>of</strong> virus to be used rather than complete<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the infected areas. Predacious and scavenging insects are thought to be the<br />
main disseminators <strong>of</strong> the viruses. In some cases strips <strong>of</strong> the infected area were<br />
sprayed, and in the case <strong>of</strong> N. swainei spot introductions <strong>of</strong> laboratory-infected pupae<br />
were used. Other viruses, again mainly NPVs, with good virulence against a number <strong>of</strong><br />
Lepidoptera, have also been evaluated. Examples are tests against the tussock moths,<br />
O. leucostigma, and O. pseudotsugata. Some less virulent viruses were also applied<br />
aerially against, for example, C. fumiferana and C. occidenlalis; others were applied by<br />
ground sprays. for example. those against M. disstria and L. dispar.<br />
The remaining entomopathogens covered in this review are essentially at the laboratory<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> development. Fungi are well known to cause epizootics, such as the one<br />
believed to have helped collapse a recent outbreak <strong>of</strong> hemlock looper, Lambdina<br />
fiscellaria fiscellaria (Guenee), in Newfoundland (Otvos 1973). Other North American<br />
forest pests in which fungal epizootics have been recorded include spruce budworm C.<br />
fumiferana, black headed budworm, Acleris variana (Fern), and forest tent caterpillar,<br />
M. disslria. Entomophthora spp. <strong>of</strong> fungi are generally responsible and these are the<br />
fungi on which the Canadian Forestry Service concentrates its effort. Much <strong>of</strong> the<br />
biology <strong>of</strong> these fungi is now elucidated; before direct applications are attempted, efforts<br />
continue to devise techniques for mass production <strong>of</strong> resting spores, to devise practical<br />
application systems, and to induce spore germination, particularly under field conditions.<br />
One study, not reported elsewhere in this review, is an examination <strong>of</strong> control possibilities<br />
<strong>of</strong> mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, with Beauveria bassiana<br />
Vuillemin. This work can be summarized by stating that although the fungus is lethal to<br />
the insect in laboratory trials, no satisfactory way has yet been found to infect insects in<br />
the field (S. Whitney2 1981, personal communication).<br />
Work with protozoa roughly parallels that with fungi and emphasis is now on epizooticlogical<br />
studies. Protozoa are dominant entomopathogens <strong>of</strong> insects such as spruce<br />
budworm, C. fumiferana, but their effects are to debilitate rather than to kill the insects,<br />
by affecting larval and pupal vigour and by reducing adult longevity and fecundity.<br />
Because these entomopathogens are ubiquitous. work continues to elucidate their<br />
interaction with other control agents.<br />
2 Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria. British Columbia.