23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156 M. G. Maw<br />

Discussion<br />

Table 37<br />

Table 38<br />

chrysomelid. Ga/eruca TUfa Germ.; and a mildew. Erysiphe convolvuli DC.. showed the<br />

most potential as control agents (Rosenthal 1980). None. however. was found to be<br />

strictly monophagous.<br />

Little biological control work has been done in <strong>Canada</strong>. However. limited attempts to<br />

augment existing populations or to establish new colonies in Alberta and British<br />

Columbia with insects from Saskatchewan and Ontario (Table 37 and Table 38) were not<br />

successful.<br />

Collection and release in <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>of</strong> chrysomelid insects in control <strong>of</strong> COlU'O/VIl/US arvensis<br />

L. projects<br />

Species Number Year Source Release or Lab Study<br />

Chirida guttala 114 1969 <strong>Canada</strong> British Columbia (study)<br />

(01.) 125 1970 Ontario British Columbia (study)<br />

236 1979 Saskatchewan Alberta (release)<br />

C/lelymorpha cassidea (F.) 97 1979 Saskatchewan Alberta (release)<br />

Melriona bie%r (F.) 18 1969 <strong>Canada</strong> British Columbia (study)<br />

7 1970 Ontario British Columbia (study)<br />

Metriona purpurata Boh. 224 1979 Saskatchewan Alberta (release)<br />

Collection and release in <strong>Canada</strong> <strong>of</strong> chrysomelid insects in control <strong>of</strong> Convo/vulus sepiwll<br />

L. projects<br />

Species<br />

Chirida gllttala (01.)<br />

Melriona bie%r (F.)<br />

Number<br />

120<br />

200<br />

Year<br />

1971<br />

1971<br />

Source<br />

Ontario<br />

Ontario<br />

Release<br />

British Columbia<br />

British Columbia<br />

Bindweed competes with crop plants for nutrients and water, and thus lowers yields. It<br />

twines around plants, smothering them and interfering with harvesting, and is a haven<br />

for crop pests (Rosenthal 1980}. It is considered to be the 12th most important weed in<br />

the world and the 14th most important weed in the United States (Rosenthal 1980). It is a<br />

serious weed in Ontario and Quebec but a lesser problem in the western provinces. It is<br />

mainly a weed in cultivated fields and so not a good candidate for biological control.<br />

A large number <strong>of</strong> insects are associated with bindweed in North America. but only<br />

sporadically in localized areas is appreciable damage done to the plant (Maw unpublished<br />

data). Also, it appears that most insect damage occurs when bindweed is<br />

supported by other plants or fences, rather than in the prostrate growth in fields.<br />

Attempts to move Chirida gllliala, Melriona bicolor and M. purpurala, and Che/ymorpha<br />

cassidea into new areas were unsuccessful. This may indicate that these species<br />

have reached their geographic limits.<br />

Rosenthal & Buckingham (1982) found a number <strong>of</strong> European organisms that may<br />

be useful as control agents <strong>of</strong> bindweed in North America. Of these. the arthropods<br />

Ga/eruca rufa, Spermophagus sericeus, and Eriophyes sp. probably have the most<br />

potential (Rosenthal 1980) and several other species may also be useful (Rosenthal &

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!