23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

314 W. O. H. Ives<br />

Releases and Recoveries<br />

Bacillus tburingJensis<br />

Berliner<br />

Biological control attempts against the forest tent caterpillar during the past decade have<br />

involved the bacterium B. Ihuringiensis, the microsporidium N. disslriae, and an NPV.<br />

Because some formulations <strong>of</strong> B. Ihuringiensis have been registered for control <strong>of</strong> the<br />

forest tent caterpillar, and have therefore been used commercially it is difficult to provide<br />

an accurate record <strong>of</strong> either the amounts used or the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the applications. The<br />

following is a summary <strong>of</strong> the more readily available information.<br />

The most comprehensive trials <strong>of</strong> B.I. against the forest tent caterpillar were conducted<br />

in Ontario in 1975,1977, and 1978 (G.M. Howse 1981 personal communication). In 1975,<br />

small-scale aerial spray trials with Thuricide® 168 (Sandoz Inc.) on trembling aspen<br />

stands in southern Ontario showed that the preparation had promise. One application at a<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 10 x 10 9 1. U .lha reduced larval populations by 71 %; two applications at the same<br />

rate caused 92% mortality. The treatment was applied too late in the season to save any<br />

foliage. In 1977, evaluations were made <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> two applications <strong>of</strong><br />

Thuricide® 16B (10 x 10' I. U .lha at each application) in controlling forest tent caterpillar<br />

populations over a total <strong>of</strong> about 850 ha <strong>of</strong> trembling aspen and sugar maple, Acer<br />

saccharum Marsh., in three provincial parks in southern Ontario. Resultant population<br />

reduction on trembling aspen ranged from 30 to 79%, and defoliation in the treated areas<br />

ranged from 5 to 46% compared to 82 to 100% in untreated areas. Similar results were<br />

obtained for infestations on sugar maple, where population reductions due to treatment<br />

ranged from 38 to 69%, and defoliation in sprayed areas was about 15%, compared to<br />

100% in an unsprayed area. A further 940 ha were sprayed with Thuricide® 16B in 1977,<br />

but no assessment <strong>of</strong> its effectiveness was made. In 1978, either one or two applications <strong>of</strong><br />

Thuricide® 168, mostly at the rate <strong>of</strong>7.5 x 10' I. U .lha for each application, were made on<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> about 515 ha <strong>of</strong> forest tent caterpillar infestations on trembling aspen, sugar<br />

maple, and red oak, Quercus rubra L., in southern Ontario. Insect populations were<br />

lower than in 1977, so the comparison <strong>of</strong> defoliation was not a practical way <strong>of</strong> showing<br />

effectiveness. However, population reduction due to treatment ranged from 79 to 100%<br />

on trembling aspen, from 71 to 100% on red oak, and was 100% in both treated<br />

infestations on sugar maple. In addition, 250 ha <strong>of</strong> sugar maple were sprayed with one<br />

application <strong>of</strong> Dipel® WP (Abbott Ltd.) (6.0 x 10' I.U.lha) in late May. Population<br />

reduction due to treatments was 98%.<br />

Data for western <strong>Canada</strong> are more fragmentary. In Alberta, a hydraulic sprayer was<br />

used in 1974 to treat two 0.2-ha plots <strong>of</strong> trembling aspen with Dipel® WP (9 x 10'<br />

I.U.lha) and a further two 0.2-ha plots with Thuricide® HPC (Sandoz Inc.) (5 x ur<br />

I.U.lha) (Drouin & Kusch 1975). Control was estimated at 75 and 70% respectively. In<br />

1976, two O.4-ha plots <strong>of</strong> trembling aspen were treated with Dipel® WP (9 x 10'<br />

I.U./ha). Control was estimated at 75 and 85%, based on the reduction in amount <strong>of</strong><br />

defoliation (Drouin & Kusch 1977). In addition, several applications were made by<br />

private operators under contract to various agencies.<br />

In Saskatchewan, Dipel® WP was used to control forest tent caterpillar outbreaks in<br />

Prince Albert and Saskatoon. In Prince Albert, about 325 ha within the city limits were<br />

treated in 1980 when the larvae were in the third and fourth instars, with good results (P.<br />

Kabat<strong>of</strong>f 1981 personal communication). The chemical insecticide malathion had been<br />

used earlier, when the larvae were in the first and second instars, because it was felt that<br />

there was insufficient foliage at that time for Dipel® WP to be effective. In Saskatoon,<br />

about 800 ha <strong>of</strong> city parks and about 40 000 avenue trees were treated with Dipel® WP in<br />

1980 (D. Scott 1981 personal communication). About 340 kg <strong>of</strong> Dipel® WP were used,<br />

and results were generally satisfactory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!