23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pest Status<br />

Table 39<br />

Chapter 35<br />

Euphorbia esula-virgata complex, Leafy<br />

Spurge and E. cyparissias L., Cypress<br />

Spurge (Euphorbiaceae)<br />

P. HARRIS<br />

Leafy and cypress spurge. Euphorbia esu/a'I'irgala complex and E. cypar/ss/as<br />

L.. are herbaceous perennials <strong>of</strong> European origin that have become problem species in<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> North America. Leafy spurge is particularly serious on the Canadian prairies<br />

and the north central United States. while cypress spurge is most prevalent in Ontario<br />

and Quebec. Both spurges are unpalatable to most grazing animals except sheep and<br />

displace other herbaceous vegetation. In two leafy spurge stands investigated in Sas·<br />

katchewan in 1981. there was 65-72% less grass within the stand than just outside it.<br />

Cypress spurge on a thin limestone soil at Braeside. Ontario. comprised 56% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

herbaceous vegetation in a dry year and 26% in a wet year (Table 39). Cypress spurge is<br />

Density <strong>of</strong> Hy/es euphorbiae (L.) larvae, dry weight <strong>of</strong> E. cyparissias L. and total<br />

herbaceous vegetation at Braeside. Ontario.<br />

Year No. H. euphorbiae Dry weight <strong>of</strong> Dry weight <strong>of</strong> all<br />

larvae/m 1 E. cyparissias glml vegetationlm l<br />

1968<br />

6.8 x 10-)<br />

1969 1.75 x 10- 1<br />

56.6 216.0<br />

1970 0.4 44.7 79.2<br />

1971 1.0 73.1 147.1<br />

1972 0.3 91.9 213.1<br />

1974 0.6<br />

1975 2.3<br />

1976 0.4<br />

also <strong>of</strong> concern as extremely small amounts <strong>of</strong> its latex are intensely irritating to the<br />

eyes. The provincial and most municipal governments <strong>of</strong> the Canadian prairies have an<br />

active programme for the control <strong>of</strong> leafy spurge. For example in the early 1950s,<br />

Saskatchewan spent around $100 OOO/year against persistent perennial weeds and by 1979<br />

the amount had risen to $150 OOO/year, with leafy spurge being the main target. The sum<br />

covers the cost <strong>of</strong> treatment on provincial and municipal lands and roadsides but only<br />

the cost <strong>of</strong> the chemical on private lands. Thus the actual cost <strong>of</strong> controlling leafy spurge<br />

was considerably higher. In Manitoba in 1981. $38649 was spent on leafy spurge control<br />

by the provincial government <strong>of</strong> which $32 890 represented the cost <strong>of</strong> the chemical (E.<br />

Johnson. 1982. personal communication). In Saskatchewan in 1982, the full cost was<br />

$640Iha <strong>of</strong> spurge treated as the infestations are scattered or on rough terrain.<br />

In the first twenty years <strong>of</strong> the control programme in Saskatchewan the chemicals<br />

used were soil stcrilants such as sodium chlorate and various borates either alone or in<br />

combination with other herbicides. These were both expensive and ecologically un-<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!