pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
180 P. Harris<br />
Background<br />
Table 47<br />
most areas it was less abundant in the early 1970s than it had been in 1956 and that<br />
toadflax was not a serious problem in cereal crops. In creeping red fescue, 180 toadflax<br />
stems/m 2 reduced the yield by a third; but in most areas there were 20 or less stems/m 2<br />
with no measurable effect on yield. Most <strong>of</strong> the dense stands <strong>of</strong> the weed were on sites<br />
that had been cleared and abandoned or were cropped infrequently.<br />
In Saskatchewan, the weed is still dense on uncultivated sandy soils from North<br />
Battleford west to Alberta. In other regions <strong>of</strong> the province it has disappeared or greatly<br />
declined since the 1950s.<br />
The decrease in the importance <strong>of</strong> the weed is reflected by the decline in the number <strong>of</strong><br />
abstracts relating to its chemical control in the Research Report <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee on<br />
Weeds (<strong>Canada</strong> Western Section) (Fig. 8). The decrease <strong>of</strong> the weed has not however<br />
changed its status under noxious weed legislation. For example in Saskatchewan provincial<br />
subsidies are still paid to municipalities for its control.<br />
L. dalmatica (L.) is considerably more persistent that L. vulgaris, and it appears to<br />
exclude most other herbaceous species from the stand. Stands are local and the total<br />
area occupied does not appear to be large. Thus in the absence <strong>of</strong> documented evidence<br />
it does not appear to <strong>of</strong>fer a serious threat.<br />
A more detailed history <strong>of</strong> the biological control <strong>of</strong> toadflax is given by Harris &<br />
Carder (1971). The decline <strong>of</strong> the weed in western <strong>Canada</strong> coincided with the appearance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the flower-feeding beetle Brachypterolus pulicarius (L.). This European<br />
beetle was present in eastern <strong>Canada</strong> and spread to the west. In addition the seedfeeding<br />
weevil Gymnaetron antirrhinii (Payk.), another European insect present in the<br />
east, was released in western <strong>Canada</strong> in 1957. Both insects are now present in regions <strong>of</strong><br />
western <strong>Canada</strong> where toadflax is common.<br />
In 1962, a European defoliating moth, Calophasia lunula (Hfn.), was first released in<br />
<strong>Canada</strong>, and it became established on the railway right-<strong>of</strong>-way at Belleville, Ontario in<br />
1966. The moth has two overlapping generations and lays single well distributed eggs.<br />
The first two larval instars are inconspicuous and frequently feed inside the flowers, but<br />
the third to fifth instars feed externally on the foliage and are easily seen. Samples taken<br />
along the railway right-<strong>of</strong>-way (Table 47) indicate that larvae were present from late May<br />
to early September, usually at a density <strong>of</strong> 2-6 larvae/100 stems regardless <strong>of</strong> the<br />
toadflax density. The density <strong>of</strong> the toadflax increased greatly following soil disturbance<br />
in the previous year. The overall level <strong>of</strong> damage was not impressive with less than 20"10<br />
<strong>of</strong> the stems being defoliated.<br />
Density <strong>of</strong> C. lunula and toadflax, L. vulgaris Mill. and L. dalmatica (L.) Mill .• along<br />
the railway at Belleville. Ontario.<br />
No. 3rd-5th instar<br />
Date No. samples· No. Toadflax stemsfm Z C. lunula larvae/m 2<br />
2 Jun 1968 26 85.7 2.0<br />
8 Aug 1968 19 89.1 3.8<br />
3 Sep 1969 158 6.6 0.05<br />
18 Jun 1970 52 7.2 0.31<br />
13 Aug 1970 205 0.98<br />
15 Aug 1971 31 7.7 0.13<br />
• (0.25 m 2 ) samples taken at 5 pace intervals