23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

180 P. Harris<br />

Background<br />

Table 47<br />

most areas it was less abundant in the early 1970s than it had been in 1956 and that<br />

toadflax was not a serious problem in cereal crops. In creeping red fescue, 180 toadflax<br />

stems/m 2 reduced the yield by a third; but in most areas there were 20 or less stems/m 2<br />

with no measurable effect on yield. Most <strong>of</strong> the dense stands <strong>of</strong> the weed were on sites<br />

that had been cleared and abandoned or were cropped infrequently.<br />

In Saskatchewan, the weed is still dense on uncultivated sandy soils from North<br />

Battleford west to Alberta. In other regions <strong>of</strong> the province it has disappeared or greatly<br />

declined since the 1950s.<br />

The decrease in the importance <strong>of</strong> the weed is reflected by the decline in the number <strong>of</strong><br />

abstracts relating to its chemical control in the Research Report <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee on<br />

Weeds (<strong>Canada</strong> Western Section) (Fig. 8). The decrease <strong>of</strong> the weed has not however<br />

changed its status under noxious weed legislation. For example in Saskatchewan provincial<br />

subsidies are still paid to municipalities for its control.<br />

L. dalmatica (L.) is considerably more persistent that L. vulgaris, and it appears to<br />

exclude most other herbaceous species from the stand. Stands are local and the total<br />

area occupied does not appear to be large. Thus in the absence <strong>of</strong> documented evidence<br />

it does not appear to <strong>of</strong>fer a serious threat.<br />

A more detailed history <strong>of</strong> the biological control <strong>of</strong> toadflax is given by Harris &<br />

Carder (1971). The decline <strong>of</strong> the weed in western <strong>Canada</strong> coincided with the appearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the flower-feeding beetle Brachypterolus pulicarius (L.). This European<br />

beetle was present in eastern <strong>Canada</strong> and spread to the west. In addition the seedfeeding<br />

weevil Gymnaetron antirrhinii (Payk.), another European insect present in the<br />

east, was released in western <strong>Canada</strong> in 1957. Both insects are now present in regions <strong>of</strong><br />

western <strong>Canada</strong> where toadflax is common.<br />

In 1962, a European defoliating moth, Calophasia lunula (Hfn.), was first released in<br />

<strong>Canada</strong>, and it became established on the railway right-<strong>of</strong>-way at Belleville, Ontario in<br />

1966. The moth has two overlapping generations and lays single well distributed eggs.<br />

The first two larval instars are inconspicuous and frequently feed inside the flowers, but<br />

the third to fifth instars feed externally on the foliage and are easily seen. Samples taken<br />

along the railway right-<strong>of</strong>-way (Table 47) indicate that larvae were present from late May<br />

to early September, usually at a density <strong>of</strong> 2-6 larvae/100 stems regardless <strong>of</strong> the<br />

toadflax density. The density <strong>of</strong> the toadflax increased greatly following soil disturbance<br />

in the previous year. The overall level <strong>of</strong> damage was not impressive with less than 20"10<br />

<strong>of</strong> the stems being defoliated.<br />

Density <strong>of</strong> C. lunula and toadflax, L. vulgaris Mill. and L. dalmatica (L.) Mill .• along<br />

the railway at Belleville. Ontario.<br />

No. 3rd-5th instar<br />

Date No. samples· No. Toadflax stemsfm Z C. lunula larvae/m 2<br />

2 Jun 1968 26 85.7 2.0<br />

8 Aug 1968 19 89.1 3.8<br />

3 Sep 1969 158 6.6 0.05<br />

18 Jun 1970 52 7.2 0.31<br />

13 Aug 1970 205 0.98<br />

15 Aug 1971 31 7.7 0.13<br />

• (0.25 m 2 ) samples taken at 5 pace intervals

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!