23.08.2013 Views

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

224 M. A. Hulme and G. W. Green<br />

ability, and good synchronization <strong>of</strong> reproduction with the host (Pschorn-Walcher<br />

1977). Inbreeding that restricts genetic variability should be limited. It is always advisable to<br />

try to ensure genetic variation between released individuals by collecting breeding stock<br />

from several locations (Bennett 1974, Mackauer 1976).<br />

Selection <strong>of</strong> collecting locations for exotic parasitoids and predators has rightly been<br />

focused on the native habitat <strong>of</strong> the pest when introduced insects are the subject <strong>of</strong><br />

control attempts and this has inevitably led to a concentration <strong>of</strong> collection efforts in<br />

Europe. Case histories, however. show that successful control agents have also been<br />

found on different hosts and in different parts <strong>of</strong> the world. and to allow for this<br />

possibility. and thus increase the probability <strong>of</strong> success, a proportion <strong>of</strong> effort should be<br />

devoted to collecting from areas other than the native habitat <strong>of</strong> the pest (Pschorn­<br />

Walcher 1977). This approach is, <strong>of</strong> course. essential where native pests are the subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> control attempts by inoculative releases.<br />

Although the above remarks are aimed principally at so-called classical biological<br />

control. they are not intended to preclude attention to other release strategies. Augmentative<br />

or inundative releases <strong>of</strong> parasitoids or predators should perhaps be considered<br />

in some cases. These techniques remain essentially untested in Canadian forestry<br />

applications despite successes claimed in Russia and China (Tropin et 01. 1980, McFadden<br />

et al. 1981). For example, in Russia release <strong>of</strong> Trichogromma evanescens Westw. against<br />

eggs <strong>of</strong> R. buoliana and Petrona resine/la (L.) reduced the number <strong>of</strong> damaged pine buds<br />

by over 50% (Beglyarov & Smetnik 1977); and in China Trichogrommo dendrolimi Mats.<br />

reduced infestation by Dendrolimus sibericus Tschetw. from 63% <strong>of</strong> trees in 1956 to 1 %<br />

<strong>of</strong> trees in 1970 (Hussey 1977). Attention could also be given to the use <strong>of</strong> behavioural<br />

chemicals such as kairomones (e.g. Gross Jr. 1981, Weseloh 1981, Vinson 1977); these<br />

semiochemicals should improve control by augmenting the ability <strong>of</strong> natural enemies to<br />

locate hosts.<br />

Finally, two fundamental research needs in predator and parasitoid introductions<br />

have been raised repeatedly in this overview. The first need covers rearing techniques to<br />

ensure that adequate numbers <strong>of</strong> biological control organisms (mated females) are available<br />

for whatever release strategy is employed. The second fundamental need is for better<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> the population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the pest insect and <strong>of</strong> the candidate predators<br />

or parasitoids. Many feel that neglecting this aspect in favour <strong>of</strong> an ad hoc approach<br />

inevitably reduces chances <strong>of</strong> obtaining successful control.It is <strong>of</strong> course recognized. as<br />

Pschorn-Walcher (1977) states, that "predictions derived from multivariate analysis or<br />

population models are no guarantee that the biological control agents selected will be<br />

effective." Judgement must be exercised in deciding how much background information<br />

is desirable before releases are attempted. As Simmonds (1972) points out. "The introduction<br />

... is the crucial experiment. Promising biological control agents have failed to<br />

live up to expectations whereas apparently unlikely species have been very successful".<br />

Entomopathogens as control agents<br />

Bacteria and viruses have dominated control successes with entomopathogens and will<br />

probably continue to do so in the immediate future as improved methods are found for<br />

producing and applying these organisms. With B.t .• for example, efficacy against C.<br />

fumi/erona has been widely demonstrated and future research emphasis will be on<br />

reducing costs. This can be approached in a number <strong>of</strong> ways. Development <strong>of</strong> more<br />

concentrated formulations to reduce the volume <strong>of</strong> carrier liquid will reduce both shipping<br />

and application costs. Development <strong>of</strong> even more potent strains <strong>of</strong> B.t. will lead to similar<br />

reductions in costs. Finally, development <strong>of</strong> better application methods will increase the<br />

probability that larvae will ingest a lethal dose from a given quantity <strong>of</strong> applied B.t. by<br />

optimising the distribution <strong>of</strong> B.t. on the leaf surface. These methods entail all aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

application technology: generating optimum-sized droplets that contain the optimum

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!