pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
pdf, 57.71Mb - Entomological Society of Canada
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
i'risliphora erichsonii (Hartig). 377<br />
outbreak proportions late in the decade 1971-1980 clearly indicates that the shrews<br />
were not able to control the insect. However, as Warren (1971) indicated, "the shrew has<br />
been a valuable predator <strong>of</strong> larch sawfly, and, despite some evidence <strong>of</strong> reduced<br />
parasitism, there has been an important net gain in cocoons destroyed". Ives (1976)<br />
showed that mortality during the cocoon and adult stages was largely responsible for<br />
determining population trends. Small mammal predation is <strong>of</strong>ten a major component <strong>of</strong><br />
this mortality, thus agreeing with Warren's assessment <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong> the masked shrew<br />
in Newfoundland.<br />
Although there is some indication that larch sawfly popUlations in and around the Pine<br />
Falls release site may now be on the increase, there has been a period <strong>of</strong> several years<br />
when this insect was extremely difficult to find. It was probably not as rare as in Europe,<br />
but it was much less common than it has been in recent memory. Two recent papers<br />
illustrate just how rare the larch sawfly can be in alpine areas <strong>of</strong> Europe. Lovis (1975)<br />
collected only six larch sawfly (out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 2816 larch insects) during a 3-year study<br />
<strong>of</strong> insects attacking native European larch in Switzerland. Auer (1971) studied the<br />
population dynamics <strong>of</strong> the larch bud moth, Zeiraphera diniana Gn., in the Upper<br />
Engadine Valley in Switzerland between 1949 and 1968. He presented population curves<br />
for eight larch insects for the period 1952 to 1968. The larch sawfly was apparently too<br />
rare to be included.<br />
The infestation patterns <strong>of</strong> the larch sawfly have been discussed by Turnock (1972).<br />
He did not consider the effects <strong>of</strong> O. benefactor, but with slight changes his discussion is<br />
still valid. He recognized three types <strong>of</strong> life systems: I) the stable latent type with a<br />
diverse environment and a rich parasitoid complex, characteristic <strong>of</strong> infestations on larch<br />
in alpine Europe; 2) the stable permanent type with a paucity <strong>of</strong> specific parasitoids,<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> many North American outbreaks before 1920; and 3) the temporary type<br />
with an intermediate parasitoid complex which includes one (or two) very effective larval<br />
parasitoid(s). characteristic <strong>of</strong> European plantings. infestations on western larch in<br />
British Columbia and on tamarack in the rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>Canada</strong> following the first successful<br />
introduction <strong>of</strong> an ichneumonid parasitoid between 1910 and 1913 (and in southeastern<br />
Manitoba following the successful introduction <strong>of</strong> O. benefaclor there in 1961). As this<br />
discussion <strong>of</strong> life systems illustrates, entomologists have been able to achieve at least<br />
partial biological control <strong>of</strong>the larch sawfly in North America. To continue this control, it<br />
may be necessary to seek ways in which biotic agents in the environment can be manipulated.<br />
Turnock & Muldrew (1971b) and Turnock et al. (1976) recognized four ways in<br />
which insect parasites or predators might be manipulated in order to help achieve<br />
biological control: 1) colonization releases; 2) inoculative releases; 3) inundative releases;<br />
and 4) enhancement <strong>of</strong> biotic agents by environmental manipulation. In the case <strong>of</strong> the<br />
larch sawfly, the last three approaches <strong>of</strong>fer the most promise. Because <strong>of</strong> the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> M. dimidiatus, any releases <strong>of</strong> O. benefactor would need to be relatively large if they<br />
were to be effective. Releases intermediate in size between inoculative and inundative.<br />
say 2 000-3000 mated females, should be able to control infestations in plantations in 2<br />
or 3 years, if released when defoliation first becomes noticeable. However, this approach<br />
would necessitate a permanent facility capable <strong>of</strong> producing parasitoids on demand.<br />
Reliance on field populations would be too uncertain, especially as M. dimidiatus will<br />
almost certainly reduce the numbers <strong>of</strong> O. benefactor adults obtainable. The Bavarian<br />
strain <strong>of</strong> Mesoleius tenthredinis could probably be managed in a similar manner. Both<br />
species might even be able to sustain themselves in the field, and thus afford more or less<br />
permanent protection. In Manitoba O. benefactor appeared to suppress M. tenthredinis<br />
by sheer numbers. but this seems unlikely to happen again.<br />
Enhancement <strong>of</strong> environmental conditions might be a particularly effective method<br />
for increasing the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> avian and small mammalian predators in plantations.<br />
Buckner (1971) discussed this situation as it related to forest insects in general. Birds<br />
might be encouraged to nest in plantations by providing suitable nesting sites. Bruns