PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the country. In St. Kitts and Nevis, reporting takes the form of oral questioning<br />
of parliamentarians on their annual record in an annual town-hall-style<br />
meeting called Face to Face:<br />
This meeting takes place at venues other than Parliament but it brings<br />
parliamentarians ‘face to face’ with the public at large.<br />
Parliamentarians are hereby made to account for their stewardship.<br />
This meeting is carried live on radio and television. There is also a live<br />
audience and participation via the <strong>Inter</strong>net and telephone. There is a<br />
moderator who channels the questions from the <strong>Inter</strong>net, the telephone<br />
and the live audience to the parliamentarians who are given time to<br />
respond. The questions are spontaneous and parliamentarians have no<br />
prior knowledge of the questions that will be asked. This format has<br />
proven to be extremely beneficial in the area of accountability and<br />
education of the public as to the work of parliament.<br />
While the examples from Luxembourg and St. Kitts involve countries with<br />
relatively small populations, there is no reason why their example could not<br />
be replicated by individual parliamentarians at a constituency level. An annual<br />
report of a member’s activity and voting record sent to all constituents at the<br />
end of each session, together with opportunities to question the member on his<br />
or her record on line or through constituency meetings, could considerably<br />
enhance confidence in the accountability of parliamentarians on a regular<br />
basis, rather than just at election time.<br />
Recall of parliamentarians<br />
The belief that an election held once every few years is insufficient for<br />
representatives to be genuinely accountable to their electorates lies behind<br />
proposals to give citizens the power to recall in mid-term those they have<br />
elected. Two jurisdictions where such a measure is in force are Uganda and<br />
the province of British Columbia in Canada. In Uganda (article 84 of the<br />
Constitution) a member of parliament may be recalled from office on any of<br />
the following grounds:<br />
■ physical or mental incapacity rendering that member incapable of performing<br />
the functions of the office; or<br />
■ misconduct or misbehaviour likely to bring hatred, ridicule, contempt or<br />
disrepute to the office; or<br />
■ persistent deserting of the electorate without reasonable cause.<br />
A parliament that is accountable I 97