26.08.2013 Views

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the country. In St. Kitts and Nevis, reporting takes the form of oral questioning<br />

of parliamentarians on their annual record in an annual town-hall-style<br />

meeting called Face to Face:<br />

This meeting takes place at venues other than Parliament but it brings<br />

parliamentarians ‘face to face’ with the public at large.<br />

Parliamentarians are hereby made to account for their stewardship.<br />

This meeting is carried live on radio and television. There is also a live<br />

audience and participation via the <strong>Inter</strong>net and telephone. There is a<br />

moderator who channels the questions from the <strong>Inter</strong>net, the telephone<br />

and the live audience to the parliamentarians who are given time to<br />

respond. The questions are spontaneous and parliamentarians have no<br />

prior knowledge of the questions that will be asked. This format has<br />

proven to be extremely beneficial in the area of accountability and<br />

education of the public as to the work of parliament.<br />

While the examples from Luxembourg and St. Kitts involve countries with<br />

relatively small populations, there is no reason why their example could not<br />

be replicated by individual parliamentarians at a constituency level. An annual<br />

report of a member’s activity and voting record sent to all constituents at the<br />

end of each session, together with opportunities to question the member on his<br />

or her record on line or through constituency meetings, could considerably<br />

enhance confidence in the accountability of parliamentarians on a regular<br />

basis, rather than just at election time.<br />

Recall of parliamentarians<br />

The belief that an election held once every few years is insufficient for<br />

representatives to be genuinely accountable to their electorates lies behind<br />

proposals to give citizens the power to recall in mid-term those they have<br />

elected. Two jurisdictions where such a measure is in force are Uganda and<br />

the province of British Columbia in Canada. In Uganda (article 84 of the<br />

Constitution) a member of parliament may be recalled from office on any of<br />

the following grounds:<br />

■ physical or mental incapacity rendering that member incapable of performing<br />

the functions of the office; or<br />

■ misconduct or misbehaviour likely to bring hatred, ridicule, contempt or<br />

disrepute to the office; or<br />

■ persistent deserting of the electorate without reasonable cause.<br />

A parliament that is accountable I 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!