26.08.2013 Views

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A representative parliament I 35<br />

relevant where the language of parliamentary business is not spoken by a<br />

majority of the population. Here questions of expense in providing translation<br />

facilities may be a constraining factor. In the Indian Lok Sabha, for example,<br />

the languages for transacting business are Hindi and English. However, since<br />

the time of the Fourth Lok Sabah members have also been allowed to address<br />

the House in any of the scheduled languages provided for in the Constitution.<br />

At present, simultaneous interpretation facilities are available in eight languages<br />

besides the two mentioned (Assamese, Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam,<br />

Marathi, Oriya, Tamil and Telegu); while in the Upper House, the Rajya<br />

Sabha, facilities are also available in Gujurati, Urdu and Punjabi.<br />

Further online reading about the use of m inority and vernacular<br />

languages in the work of parliam ents:<br />

Matiki, A (2002). Language planning and linguistic exclusion in the legislative<br />

process in Malawi. <br />

The House: New Zealand’s House of Representatives 1854-2004 (2005).<br />

Parliament in Te Reo. <br />

Facilitating all members in their work<br />

Besides the more obvious forms of inequality between members already<br />

considered, there may be less visible differences in resources or capacity<br />

which put some members at a systematic disadvantage. The issue of parliamentary<br />

resources and facilities will be considered more fully in chapter 6.<br />

Here it is sufficient to point out that members should enjoy equal access<br />

to them, and that parliament’s research and library staff should serve all<br />

members impartially.<br />

This is not only a question of facilities, however, but of the capacity to use<br />

them. For example, most parliaments now have on-line facilities so that members<br />

can have up-to-the-minute information on the progress of bills and other<br />

aspects of parliamentary business. All surveys of the use of electronic means<br />

of communication, however, show that inequalities between users are not just<br />

a matter of equipment, but of the ability to use it across its full range. The fact<br />

that parliamentarians now increasingly come from professional backgrounds<br />

means that such abilities may simply be taken for granted. Yet everyone<br />

requires training, even if only to keep their skills updated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!