PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A representative parliament I 35<br />
relevant where the language of parliamentary business is not spoken by a<br />
majority of the population. Here questions of expense in providing translation<br />
facilities may be a constraining factor. In the Indian Lok Sabha, for example,<br />
the languages for transacting business are Hindi and English. However, since<br />
the time of the Fourth Lok Sabah members have also been allowed to address<br />
the House in any of the scheduled languages provided for in the Constitution.<br />
At present, simultaneous interpretation facilities are available in eight languages<br />
besides the two mentioned (Assamese, Bengali, Kannada, Malayalam,<br />
Marathi, Oriya, Tamil and Telegu); while in the Upper House, the Rajya<br />
Sabha, facilities are also available in Gujurati, Urdu and Punjabi.<br />
Further online reading about the use of m inority and vernacular<br />
languages in the work of parliam ents:<br />
Matiki, A (2002). Language planning and linguistic exclusion in the legislative<br />
process in Malawi. <br />
The House: New Zealand’s House of Representatives 1854-2004 (2005).<br />
Parliament in Te Reo. <br />
Facilitating all members in their work<br />
Besides the more obvious forms of inequality between members already<br />
considered, there may be less visible differences in resources or capacity<br />
which put some members at a systematic disadvantage. The issue of parliamentary<br />
resources and facilities will be considered more fully in chapter 6.<br />
Here it is sufficient to point out that members should enjoy equal access<br />
to them, and that parliament’s research and library staff should serve all<br />
members impartially.<br />
This is not only a question of facilities, however, but of the capacity to use<br />
them. For example, most parliaments now have on-line facilities so that members<br />
can have up-to-the-minute information on the progress of bills and other<br />
aspects of parliamentary business. All surveys of the use of electronic means<br />
of communication, however, show that inequalities between users are not just<br />
a matter of equipment, but of the ability to use it across its full range. The fact<br />
that parliamentarians now increasingly come from professional backgrounds<br />
means that such abilities may simply be taken for granted. Yet everyone<br />
requires training, even if only to keep their skills updated.