A parliament that is accountable I 109 To compensate for potentially lost income to parties as a result of the changes in eligibility of donors, an annual allowance to registered parties is now provided in the amount of $1.75 per vote received by the party in the previous general election (to be adjusted for inflation), provided that the party has received either 2% of the valid votes cast nationally or 5% of the votes in the ridings where the party ran candidates. This is designed to be revenue neutral as it is believed that financially healthy political parties contribute to the viability of the electoral process. The changes also added an incentive to encourage contributions by individuals by doubling the portion of an individual’s political donation that is eligible for a 75% tax credit, from $200 to $400. Further online reading about party financing: Austin, R. and Tjernström, M. (eds) (2003). Funding of parties and election campaigns. <strong>Inter</strong>national IDEA Bryan, S. and Baer, D (eds.) (2005). Money in politics: a study of party financing practices in 22 countries. National Democratic Institute <strong>Inter</strong>national IDEA (2005). Political finance database. Johnston, M. (2005). Political parties and democracy in theoretical and practical perspectives: political finance policy, parties, and democratic development. National Democratic Institute Moneyandpolitics.net. Monitoring public opinion One feature that can contribute to the accountability of parliaments is the regular assessment of their public standing through opinion surveys, though only a few parliaments conduct these in any systematic way. Mostly we rely for such assessments on the findings of the regional ‘barometer’ surveys (Latinobarometer, Afrobarometer, etc.). These confirm a conclusion already suggested earlier, that parliaments as an institution do not stand high in public
110 I <strong>PARLIAMENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DEMOCRACY</strong> IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY esteem, though there are significant regional differences, as table 5.1 shows. In the case of the European <strong>Union</strong> countries, for which figures exist over time, the figures show a marked decline in trust in parliaments having taken place over the period from the mid 1980s to the late 1990s (see, for example, Susan J. Pharr and Robert D. Putnam eds., Disaffected Democracies, Princeton, 2000; Susan Hattis Rolef, Trust in Parliaments - Some Theoretical and Empirical Findings, unpublished manuscript, The Knesset, Israel, 2005). Figure 5.1: Trust in national institutions: regional averages Note: Regional averages and the figures for individual countries are usefully summarised and tabulated in <strong>Inter</strong>national IDEA (2005) Ten Years of Supporting Democracy Worldwide, pages 63 – 64, <strong>Inter</strong>national Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Stockholm, Sweden. The regional averages here are from this source, compiled from the regional Barometers respectively. ‘Trust’ is the combination of ‘a lot or some trust’, as opposed to ‘little or no trust’ and don’t know’. ‘Party’ is ‘the ruling party’. Figures for European <strong>Union</strong> are from European Commission (2004), Eurobarometer 61: Public Opinion in the European <strong>Union</strong>, page 10, at The choice of Eurobarometer 61, rather than a later one, is in order to be as consistent as possible with the years when the other areas were sampled: the underlying survey data was collected in Africa 2002/3; New Europe 2004/5; East Asia 2001-3; and Latin America 2003; European <strong>Union</strong>, Spring 2004. ‘Party’ is here in the plural as ‘political parties’. ‘Courts’ here is ‘’justice/the legal system’. The figures are for those answering ‘tend to trust’ from a choice of ‘tend to trust’; ‘tend not to trust’ and ‘don’t know’. Countries and regions featured: Africa (15): Mali, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Lesotho, Botswana, Ghana, Uganda, Namibia, Kenya, Zambia, Senegal, South Africa, Cape Verde, Nigeria New Europe (11): Estonia, Hungary, Lithuania, Romania, Poland, Latvia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Russia East Asia (8): China, Thailand, Mongolia, Philippines, Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Latin America (17): Brazil, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Honduras, Panama, Mexico, El Salvador, Paraguay, Argentina, Peru, Nicaragua, Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala European <strong>Union</strong> (15): Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. These figures exclude countries of the enlarged European <strong>Union</strong>, who became members on May 1 st 2004.
- Page 1 and 2:
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE TWE
- Page 3 and 4:
ii I PARLEMENTS ET DÉMOCRATIE AU 2
- Page 5 and 6:
iv I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 7 and 8:
vi I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 9 and 10:
viii I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN
- Page 11 and 12:
x I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE
- Page 13 and 14:
xii I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 15 and 16:
2 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE
- Page 17 and 18:
4 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE
- Page 19 and 20:
6 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE
- Page 21 and 22:
8 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN THE
- Page 23 and 24:
10 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 26 and 27:
2. A representative parliament The
- Page 28 and 29:
Electoral systems A representative
- Page 30 and 31:
A representative parliament I 17 se
- Page 32 and 33:
Election rules and procedures to en
- Page 34 and 35:
A representative parliament I 21 Th
- Page 36 and 37:
A representative parliament I 23
- Page 38 and 39:
A representative parliament I 25 ge
- Page 40 and 41:
A representative parliament I 27 Fu
- Page 42 and 43:
Foreign Affairs in the Norwegian St
- Page 44 and 45:
A representative parliament I 31 Th
- Page 46 and 47:
A representative parliament I 33 ca
- Page 48 and 49:
A representative parliament I 35 re
- Page 50 and 51:
ment to following through a process
- Page 52 and 53:
A representative parliament I 39 An
- Page 54:
A representative parliament I 41 In
- Page 57 and 58:
44 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 59 and 60:
46 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 61 and 62:
48 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 63 and 64:
50 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 65 and 66:
52 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 67 and 68:
54 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 69 and 70:
56 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 71 and 72: 58 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 73 and 74: 60 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 75 and 76: 62 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 77 and 78: 64 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 79 and 80: 66 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 82 and 83: 4. An accessible parliament The pre
- Page 84 and 85: ■ the fixed office; An accessible
- Page 86 and 87: ■ collaborating with NGOs in loca
- Page 88 and 89: An accessible parliament I 75 Nowad
- Page 90 and 91: ned against excessive reductions in
- Page 92 and 93: An accessible parliament I 79 Furth
- Page 94 and 95: An accessible parliament I 81 estab
- Page 96 and 97: Extract from handbook on ‘Making
- Page 98 and 99: An accessible parliament I 85 This
- Page 100 and 101: ■ a public record available on li
- Page 102 and 103: An accessible parliament I 89 The N
- Page 104 and 105: case in Switzerland, the country wi
- Page 106: An accessible parliament I 93 since
- Page 109 and 110: 96 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 111 and 112: 98 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN TH
- Page 113 and 114: 100 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 115 and 116: 102 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 117 and 118: 104 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 119 and 120: 106 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 121: 108 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 125 and 126: 112 I PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY IN T
- Page 128 and 129: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 130 and 131: Where parliaments lack capacity thr
- Page 132 and 133: that the Senate, the House of Commo
- Page 134 and 135: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 136 and 137: consideration of a bill more effect
- Page 138 and 139: National Assembly is currently in t
- Page 140 and 141: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 142 and 143: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 144 and 145: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 146 and 147: Oversight through parliamentary que
- Page 148 and 149: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 150 and 151: A case-study of oversight: security
- Page 152 and 153: Anti-terrorist legislation An effec
- Page 154 and 155: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 156 and 157: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 158 and 159: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 160 and 161: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 162 and 163: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 164 and 165: An effective parliament (I): The na
- Page 168 and 169: An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 170 and 171: An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 172 and 173:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 174 and 175:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 176 and 177:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 178 and 179:
Japan’s ODA is effectively reachi
- Page 180 and 181:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 182 and 183:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 184 and 185:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 186 and 187:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 188 and 189:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 190 and 191:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 192 and 193:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 194 and 195:
An effective parliament (II): Parli
- Page 196 and 197:
8. Facing the future Facing the fut
- Page 198 and 199:
Figure 8.1: Sources of Parliamentar
- Page 200 and 201:
Facing the future I 187 State: give
- Page 202 and 203:
and also to allow for increased par
- Page 204 and 205:
strengthening of both legislative a
- Page 206 and 207:
As regards the practicability and c
- Page 208 and 209:
3. Technology assessment. This has
- Page 210 and 211:
Australia Austria Belarus Belgium B
- Page 212 and 213:
Organization’s programmes aimed a
- Page 214 and 215:
MS. MARTA LAGOS CRUZ-COKE Executive
- Page 216 and 217:
MS. DULCE MARIA SAURI RIANCHO Membe
- Page 218 and 219:
Commonwealth Parliamentary Associat
- Page 220 and 221:
Non-governmental organisations Cent
- Page 222 and 223:
Index Note: Page numbers in bold in
- Page 224 and 225:
types of, 8, 15-17, 69 voter partic
- Page 226 and 227:
Myanmar, 176 Namibia, 77, 110 Natio
- Page 228:
Sweden, 63, 75, 110, 112, 165 gende