PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
An effective parliament (I): The national level I 151<br />
Parliament to the advantage of the latter. This reflected a popular swing<br />
against the ‘super-presidential power’ and ‘heavy hand’ typical of the<br />
immediate post-Communist period. When the popular protests began about<br />
the flawed elections of late October 2004, Parliament was able to act as the<br />
catalyst in ‘directing a boisterous stream of public protest into a legitimate<br />
resolution of the social crisis’, which included the completion of the<br />
constitutional reform programme.<br />
The events in the Parliament adequately reflected what was going on<br />
among the people. In the moment of the most deteriorated situation<br />
after the run-off elections on 21 October 2004 when the people took to<br />
the streets protesting against systematic breaches of the Constitution,<br />
current laws and one of the fundamental rights to free expression, the<br />
Verkhovna Rada adopted the famous Resolution on the political crisis<br />
in the country. The Parliament declared invalid the outcomes of the<br />
run-off elections and expressed a no-confidence vote in the Central<br />
Electoral Commission…..Finally the idea of the political reform came<br />
to the surface again when the situation seemed to be developing into a<br />
stalemate. On 8 December 2004 the Parliament approved by 402 votes<br />
(out of 450) the Law of Ukraine ‘On Amendments to the Constitution’.<br />
According to the law the parliamentary-presidential form of government<br />
will come into force on 1 January 2006. This almost unanimous<br />
decision by the people’s deputies resulted in the abatement of tension<br />
paving the way for a final resolution of the conflict.<br />
These different examples underline the close relation between what seem<br />
at first sight like technical matters of parliamentary organisation (autonomy,<br />
legislative organisation, oversight, budgetary control) and the delivery of<br />
outcomes which are relevant to societal needs, whether in terms of legislation,<br />
budget priorities, or the capacity to intervene effectively at points of national<br />
crisis and emergency.