PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
118 I <strong>PARLIAMENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DEMOCRACY</strong> IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY<br />
tial and parliamentary systems is more clearly marked. In the former the<br />
typical challenge may be to achieve effective cooperation between legislature<br />
and executive; in the latter the challenge is rather to achieve a more robust<br />
organisational independence or autonomy.<br />
What exactly does parliamentary ‘autonomy’ entail? A report by the<br />
Association of Secretary Generals of Parliament (ASGP) in 1998 defines<br />
autonomy in this context as ‘on the one hand non-dependence and non-subordination<br />
of Assemblies in relation to the Executive, and, on the other, the<br />
possibility of the Assembly freeing itself at least partially from the rules of<br />
ordinary law so as to follow instead its own regulatons.’ It notes that ‘in almost<br />
all states, the principle of the autonomy of Parliament is formally recognised<br />
in the constitutional texts….dealing with the separation of powers.’ And it<br />
concludes that the general trend is to make this principle increasingly effective<br />
in practice. (Michel Couderc, ‘The principle of parliamentary autonomy’,<br />
Constitutional and <strong>Parliamentary</strong> Information, No. 176, 1998)<br />
Implementing the principle of autonomy in practice involves a number of<br />
different aspects, as set out in the submission to the present study by the<br />
Slovenian Parliament:<br />
■ parliamentary responsibility for its own staffing;<br />
■ control over its own budget;<br />
■ organisation of its own business.<br />
As to the first of these, submissions from the Indian and Canadian<br />
Parliaments respectively underline the importance of parliamentary staff being<br />
independent of the central public or civil service:<br />
India: To effectively carry out its functions within the framework of the<br />
separation of powers it is essential that Parliament should have an<br />
independent Secretariat. With the underlying objective of ensuring the<br />
concept of executive and administrative accountability to Parliament,<br />
separate and independent Secretariats for the two Houses of<br />
Parliament have been provided for in Article 98 of the Constitution<br />
of India.<br />
Canada: A Parliament’s effectiveness is in large measure a reflection<br />
of the mechanisms and resources that ensure its independence and<br />
autonomy. The operational independence of the Canadian Parliament<br />
is provided for in the Constitution and by legislation that guarantees