26.08.2013 Views

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

118 I <strong>PARLIAMENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DEMOCRACY</strong> IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY<br />

tial and parliamentary systems is more clearly marked. In the former the<br />

typical challenge may be to achieve effective cooperation between legislature<br />

and executive; in the latter the challenge is rather to achieve a more robust<br />

organisational independence or autonomy.<br />

What exactly does parliamentary ‘autonomy’ entail? A report by the<br />

Association of Secretary Generals of Parliament (ASGP) in 1998 defines<br />

autonomy in this context as ‘on the one hand non-dependence and non-subordination<br />

of Assemblies in relation to the Executive, and, on the other, the<br />

possibility of the Assembly freeing itself at least partially from the rules of<br />

ordinary law so as to follow instead its own regulatons.’ It notes that ‘in almost<br />

all states, the principle of the autonomy of Parliament is formally recognised<br />

in the constitutional texts….dealing with the separation of powers.’ And it<br />

concludes that the general trend is to make this principle increasingly effective<br />

in practice. (Michel Couderc, ‘The principle of parliamentary autonomy’,<br />

Constitutional and <strong>Parliamentary</strong> Information, No. 176, 1998)<br />

Implementing the principle of autonomy in practice involves a number of<br />

different aspects, as set out in the submission to the present study by the<br />

Slovenian Parliament:<br />

■ parliamentary responsibility for its own staffing;<br />

■ control over its own budget;<br />

■ organisation of its own business.<br />

As to the first of these, submissions from the Indian and Canadian<br />

Parliaments respectively underline the importance of parliamentary staff being<br />

independent of the central public or civil service:<br />

India: To effectively carry out its functions within the framework of the<br />

separation of powers it is essential that Parliament should have an<br />

independent Secretariat. With the underlying objective of ensuring the<br />

concept of executive and administrative accountability to Parliament,<br />

separate and independent Secretariats for the two Houses of<br />

Parliament have been provided for in Article 98 of the Constitution<br />

of India.<br />

Canada: A Parliament’s effectiveness is in large measure a reflection<br />

of the mechanisms and resources that ensure its independence and<br />

autonomy. The operational independence of the Canadian Parliament<br />

is provided for in the Constitution and by legislation that guarantees

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!