PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A representative parliament I 31<br />
The effective organisation of business is an issue that occupies all parliaments,<br />
and it will be examined in chapter 6. Here it will suffice to point out<br />
two different ways in which the problem raised from Sweden is addressed by<br />
other parliaments. One is the route taken by the Italian Camera dei Deputati,<br />
of achieving strict agreement in advance on the time and length of all contributions,<br />
‘including personal interventions by deputies who are not speaking on<br />
behalf of a parliamentary group’. The other is simply to expand the time available.<br />
For example, in the Indian Lok Sabha an institution has emerged called<br />
‘Zero Hour’, which takes place after the formal Question Hour and before the<br />
beginning of regular listed business. It has been described as follows:<br />
The emergence of Zero Hour can be traced to the early sixties when<br />
issues of great public importance and urgency began to be raised by<br />
members, sometimes with the prior permission of the Speaker or some<br />
other times without such permission. Members are free to raise any<br />
matter – international, national or local – that concerns them. Zero<br />
Hour has been described in terms such as ‘waste of public money’,<br />
‘mad hour’, ‘a great beginning of an evil day’ and ‘an unwanted<br />
thing’. But it has become lively and important. Sometimes it is<br />
regarded as the biggest hurdle for presiding officers to transact normal<br />
business, at others it is seen as something original in the way of<br />
parliamentary lexicon and practice.<br />
A more radical way of increasing the amount of parliamentary time available<br />
for ordinary members has been the introduction of a parallel chamber.<br />
The Australian House of Representatives, which was the first to develop such<br />
an institution, called the Main Committee, sees this as its most significant item<br />
of recent reform. ‘This body cannot commence parliamentary business and it<br />
cannot make a final decision on such business, but it can do everything<br />
in between. It has dramatically increased the amount of available time for<br />
government business and private members’ business, permitted ongoing<br />
debates on parliamentary committee reports and provided members with more<br />
opportunity to debate matters.’ A similar parallel chamber, called Westminster<br />
Hall, has been introduced in the UK House of Commons.<br />
Gender equality<br />
Ensuring that women are able to play a full part in parliamentary work is<br />
not only a matter of expanding their opportunities for access to elective office.<br />
It also requires that parliament’s own arrangements are such as to facilitate