PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A case-study of oversight:<br />
security policy<br />
An effective parliament (I): The national level I 137<br />
An area of policy where the issue of parliamentary oversight is currently<br />
being much debated is that of security policy. In a Handbook on<br />
<strong>Parliamentary</strong> Oversight of the Security Sector, published jointly by the IPU<br />
and the Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (2003),<br />
three particular challenges are identified for oversight of this policy area:<br />
■ Secrecy laws may hinder efforts to enhance transparency in the<br />
security sector……<br />
■ The security sector is a highly complex field, in which parliaments<br />
have to oversee issues such as weapons procurement, arms control<br />
and the readiness/preparedness of military units. Not all parliamentarians<br />
have sufficient knowledge and expertise to deal with these<br />
issues in an effective manner……<br />
■ The emphasis on international security cooperation may affect the<br />
transparency and democratic legitimacy of a country’s security<br />
policy if it leads to parliament being left out of the process. (p.19)<br />
Two currently troublesome aspects of oversight in this sector can be taken<br />
to exemplify the challenges involved. The first is approval for the deployment<br />
of a country’s armed forces abroad. The Handbook notes that ‘from a good<br />
governance perspective, it is proper and advisable that …..parliament should<br />
have the opportunity to participate in the decision of engaging armed forces<br />
abroad’(p.118). We should add ‘from a democratic perspective’ also. In actual<br />
fact, as the Handbook observes, practice is very variable, from those countries<br />
where deploying troops abroad requires prior parliamentary approval, or in<br />
emergency approval after the event, to those where deployment is the<br />
prerogative of the executive, and parliament is only allowed to debate the issue<br />
but not to control the executive’s discretion.<br />
At the former end of the spectrum are countries such as Sweden and<br />
Germany. In the submission received from the German Bundestag for this<br />
study, it is noted that ‘compared to other countries, the German Bundestag<br />
enjoys very extensive rights of participation in these decisions.’ Its right of<br />
prior approval for the deployment of armed forces abroad was affirmed in a<br />
judgement of the Federal Constitutional Court in 1994, and the precise<br />
mechanism for approval, largely based on existing practice, was spelled out<br />
in the Act on <strong>Parliamentary</strong> Participation of December 2004. The approval<br />
procedure is described as follows: