26.08.2013 Views

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

190 I <strong>PARLIAMENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DEMOCRACY</strong> IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY<br />

tively, has had a particular bearing on the revision to parliamentary procedures.<br />

The Israeli Knesset ‘is constantly engaged in reforms and changes’,<br />

most recently to streamline its internal procedures and improve its standing<br />

with the public. The Italian Parliament is currently engaged in a wide-ranging<br />

reform of the constitution, affecting such things as the balance between the<br />

two chambers in the legislative process, a reduction in the number of members<br />

in each chamber and in the minimum age for voters and candidates. The<br />

Portuguese Parliament has been involved in a substantial recent programme of<br />

reforms, intended to strengthen oversight of the executive, to monitor implementation<br />

of the laws and to bring parliament closer to the people. In the<br />

United Kingdom, the logic of democratisation has generated numerous<br />

reforms since 1997, including the abolition of the hereditary element in the<br />

Upper House, the creation of a devolved parliament for Scotland and assemblies<br />

for Wales and Northern Ireland, the introduction of a Human Rights Act,<br />

and many others.<br />

Facilitators and obstacles to reform<br />

It should be clear from what has been said above that the process of parliamentary<br />

reform under the different influences described is a self-generating<br />

one, whether it take the form of a large-scale programme or an accumulation<br />

of small-scale changes. However, the process can be considerably facilitated<br />

by external assistance, especially for those parliaments which are weak in<br />

resources and expertise. For the parliaments reporting in this study the UNDP<br />

has been a particularly significant resource, but there are many other international<br />

agencies involved in such support, including of course the IPU itself.<br />

A list of the main international, regional and bilateral agencies involved in<br />

parliamentary support, with a description of their characteristic emphases, is<br />

provided in the Annexes. A standard feature of such assistance is the preparation<br />

of an agreed programme of parliamentary reform, with clear priorities and<br />

means of implementation.<br />

Examples of such assistance include Burkina Faso, which agreed a ten-year<br />

programme of parliamentary development from 2004 with UNDP, concentrating<br />

on addressing an identified deficiency of information and communication<br />

between parliament and public. Cote d’Ivoire’s agreed programme of support<br />

from the same quarter covers the installation of a cyberspace in the library and<br />

the recruitment of national experts to service parliamentary groups. In Fiji<br />

support is directed to strengthening the <strong>Parliamentary</strong> Secretariat and committee<br />

back-up, and improving support services for members and constituencies.<br />

An agreement made by the Lebanese Parliament in 1999 comprises the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!