26.08.2013 Views

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A parliament that is open and transparent I 47<br />

In an effort to comply with citizens’ constitutional right to information,<br />

Senate regulations include rather detailed provisions covering, for<br />

example, the need to inform the public of forthcoming Senate sittings,<br />

public right to attend Senate and Senate committee sittings, public<br />

access to Senate papers, minutes and stenographic reports from Senate<br />

and Senate committee sittings, as well as to other documents and information<br />

associated with the work of Senate and its bodies …… There is<br />

no doubt that access to information issues legislated in so much detail<br />

has a great deal of impact on the transparency of work performed by<br />

the Senate and its bodies, contributing on one hand to the democratisation<br />

of life and, on the other, to activating citizens who can, if they so<br />

wish, become familiar with Senate work via the access to information<br />

from of their choice. This is extremely important for a democratic<br />

societal control of people’s representatives, whose performance voters<br />

can scrutinise using numerous possibilities of accessing information<br />

while at the same time learning democratic parliamentary procedures.<br />

Romania’s parliament is covered by a general law on the free access to<br />

information of public interest. ‘In application of this law, the Senate and<br />

Chamber of Deputies provide access to information of public interest, both<br />

ex officio and on request, through their respective specialised services.’<br />

Slovenia’s parliament is also covered by a general act on Access to<br />

Information of a Public Character, applying to all public bodies. Ecuador has<br />

its own access to information statute, ‘guaranteeing the transparency of all<br />

public activity including that of parliament’. Typical of all such legislation is<br />

the existence of independent bodies which are authorised to hear complaints<br />

against decisions to deny access to information, including those made by<br />

parliament itself. Here, to take another example, is how the Parliament of<br />

Jamaica describes the purpose of its FOI Act:<br />

The objects of this Act are to reinforce and give further effect to certain<br />

fundamental principles underlying the system of constitutional democracy,<br />

namely – a) governmental accountability; b) transparency; and<br />

c) public participation in national decision-making, by granting the<br />

public a general right of access to official documents held by public<br />

authorities.<br />

Many international organisations have published model FOI laws, which<br />

are very similar in the issues covered. Here, for example, are some of the key<br />

principles for FOI outlined in a publication by the global campaign for free<br />

expression, Article 19:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!