PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
PARLIAMENT AND DEMOCRACY - Inter-Parliamentary Union
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
140 I <strong>PARLIAMENT</strong> <strong>AND</strong> <strong>DEMOCRACY</strong> IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY<br />
Further online reading about parliam entary oversight<br />
of security policy:<br />
<strong>Inter</strong>-<strong>Parliamentary</strong> <strong>Union</strong>, Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of<br />
Armed Forces (2003). <strong>Parliamentary</strong> oversight of the security sector principles,<br />
mechanisms and practices. <br />
National Democratic Institute (2005). Democratic oversight of police forces,<br />
mechanisms for accountability and community policing. <br />
Budgetary scrutiny and financial control<br />
A central function of parliaments has always been to exercise control over<br />
the raising and spending of public revenue. The familiar slogan ‘no taxation<br />
without representation’ implies that only the express consent given by elected<br />
representatives can make the compulsory exactions of government acceptable<br />
to citizens. <strong>Parliamentary</strong> oversight of government finances can be separated<br />
into two broad phases: consideration and approval of the government’s plans<br />
for the raising and spending of revenue ex ante, through consideration of its<br />
proposed budget; and the monitoring of expenditure ex post, to ensure that it<br />
has conformed to the terms which parliament has approved. Naturally, the<br />
outcome of the latter phase will affect the former in the next round of the<br />
annual cycle, so the whole can be seen as a continuous process. For purposes<br />
of analysis, however, the two phases can be considered separately.<br />
Budgetary scrutiny<br />
It is a task of the executive to draw up detailed annual budget proposals for<br />
the raising and expenditure of revenue by government. In Westminster-type<br />
systems the tradition has been for the budget to be presented for parliamentary<br />
scrutiny on an appointed day as a complete package, with little room for parliament<br />
to make substantive policy changes. The Chancellor of the Exchequer<br />
or equivalent might receive submissions from various social and economic<br />
interests during the process of budget formulation, but parliament itself would<br />
not be consulted or informed of the contents prior to the presentation of the