india author m 1- a-nan - University of Wollongong
india author m 1- a-nan - University of Wollongong
india author m 1- a-nan - University of Wollongong
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notes Sarojini’s English influences (the Rhymers’ Club, Keats, Shelley) and praises<br />
her lyric celebration <strong>of</strong> life’s variety. More ‘native’ than Toru Dutt, her work shows empathy<br />
with nature, sympathy for the poor and understanding <strong>of</strong> Indian Muslims. Vivid description<br />
accompanies subjective emotion and intimations <strong>of</strong> spirituality. Nature poetry is more<br />
Tennysonian than Wordsworthian and love poetry echoes medieval devotional verse.<br />
Sexuality and the modern industrial world are absent. Lists critical reactions (ornateness,<br />
stridency, nostalgia) but is adulatory overall.<br />
DWIVEDI, A.N. Sarojini Naidu and Her Poetry Allahabad: Kitab Mahal, 1981, xii + 164<br />
pp.<br />
DWIVEDI, A.N. "Sarojini Naidu's Poetic Technique" Poetry 12.1 (1987): 47-57.<br />
GHOSE, SISIRKUMAR. "Sarojini Naidu: Towards a Revaluation." Osmania Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
English Studies 16, no.1 (1980): 23-36. Reprinted as "Salaam for Sarojini: Towards a<br />
Revaluation," Perspectives on Sarojini Naidu (Ghaziabad: Vimal Prakashan, 1989): 206-217.<br />
The kind <strong>of</strong> romantic poetry Sarojini Naidu wrote is no longer in fashion. Ghose<br />
concentrates on her wit and humour (she referred to Mahatma Gandhi as "Mickey Mouse"),<br />
so obvious in her speeches and letters. Ghose feels that she is not rooted in her poems, the<br />
whole person is seldom involved, "the gulmohars, champaks, kokilas run riot in a touristy,<br />
picture postcard dreamland." The love poems are not deeply felt. She was the first to deal<br />
with humbler folk, like weavers and fishermen, but "it is all from the outside". She herself<br />
confessed "I am not a poet really", which explains her devoting herself totally to the freedom<br />
struggle, without giving up her sensitivity; she refused to follow Gandhiji in giving up good food<br />
or clothes, and persisted in wearing silk instead <strong>of</strong> handspun khadi.<br />
GUPTA, RAMESHWAR. "Sarojini Naidu: Her Poetic Achievement." The Rajasthan Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> English Studies 1, no.1 (1974): 1-5.<br />
Critically evaluates her overall poetic achievement. Sarojini Naidu wrote 184 short<br />
poems, no epic, dramatic or narrative poetry. She is essentially a lyricist, without much<br />
growth. Her work is characterized by delicate fancy and haunting melody. There is no<br />
intellectual content in her poetry. Her canvas is limited, many <strong>of</strong> her poems are on romantic<br />
love. Nature poems deal mainly with Basant (spring). Her achievment lies in finding metrical<br />
rhythms for Indian folk tunes; she succeeded in recreating the colour and pageantry, the<br />
sensuous aspect, <strong>of</strong> Indian life, rather than the mystical or the spiritual.<br />
GUPTA, RAMESHWAR. "Sarojini Naidu: The Flouter <strong>of</strong> the Metaphysical Tradition."<br />
Osmania Journal <strong>of</strong> English Studies 16, no.1 (1980):37-49.<br />
Sarojini's creative years spanned the Hulme-Pound-Eliot period, and she would have<br />
known about the new trends in poetry. Gupta feels that she rejected it, just as she rejected<br />
Gandhian austere living. She remained steeped in Elizabethan romanticism, taking joy in colour<br />
and beauty. Gupta defends Sarojini's poetry against the strictures laid on it by modern poets in<br />
P. Lal and Raghavendra Rao's Modern Indo-Anglian Poetry (1959). He admits the charge <strong>of</strong><br />
verbosity, but points out that there are many poems (such as the folk songs) in which every<br />
word is inevitable, and cannot be removed or changed without loss. She is said to ignore<br />
reality; Gupta observes that the pleasant aspects <strong>of</strong> life she writes about, spring and youth and<br />
love, are also part <strong>of</strong> life. As for being ephemeral, she herself was aware that her poetry was<br />
ephemeral. She was free and spontaneous and mellifluous like a bird in her lyrics. Modern<br />
poets cannot equal the melody <strong>of</strong> her diction.