Untitled - Awaken Video
Untitled - Awaken Video
Untitled - Awaken Video
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5. The Underworld 135<br />
would not have only seemed foreign to the ancient Northern Europeans, but would<br />
have been considered foolish or insane. Anyone believing such was leaving himself<br />
open to attack, illness, and possibly even death. The idea that the Underworld is<br />
a fun, cute, and exciting place is becoming relatively pervasive in the latter half<br />
of the 20 th century, however, so anyone proffering the idea that there might be<br />
danger involved in the tradition will not only be viewed by the “authorities” as<br />
being slightly weird, but will also be lambasted by the newest generation of “psychic<br />
flower-children.”<br />
The Northern European Underworld is part of a worldview, a Germanic worldview<br />
to be precise, and in this worldview otherworldly beings, as with many in<br />
the Land of the Living, are potentially dangerous. Destruction and creation are<br />
side-by-side processes. The ancient Germanic peoples did not survive by hiding<br />
themselves in a quaint fairy-tale fantasy but by plowing their fields, butchering<br />
their animals, and fighting and killing off invading forces when necessary. Their<br />
worldview provided them with information regarding choices in the course of action.<br />
They lived their lives in the physical world as they interpreted it; they did not live<br />
a pretend life within the constructs of their imaginations.<br />
Another area of “wishful thinking” which is imposed by the New Age upon the<br />
Germanic worldview is that of reincarnation. The debate can (and really has) gone<br />
on endlessly about whether or not the ancient Germanic people believed in some<br />
concept which involved the transmigration of souls. This, for the most part, is an<br />
importation of the whole East-West connection thing (discussed in Chap. 2). It is a<br />
nice philosophy which involves the learning of life’s lessons over a cycle of lifetimes<br />
and will not really be dealt with here. It should be mentioned, though, that in some<br />
rare cases in sagaic and eddaic literature, an individual (or at least part of him) was<br />
reborn to carry out a specific task usually related to revenge or leadership. The two<br />
cases usually dredged up for “proof” of the belief of reincarnation are those of Helgi<br />
Hundingsbane 33 (from the Sigurd cycle) and of St. Ólaf 34 . Without belaboring the<br />
point, Helgi had an act of revenge which needed to be carried out, and St. Ólaf<br />
denied being reincarnated. The fact that the individual asking St. Ólaf about the<br />
possibility of reincarnation most probably relates to the idea that if a soul is not<br />
completely laid to rest, it will wander. Reincarnation, as it is commonly understood<br />
today, most likely did not have a place in the early Germanic worldview. The passing<br />
on of familial luck/ power through the hamingja, and unrestful souls, however, did.<br />
These ideas are presented above and in Chap. 2.<br />
On the other hand, the ancient Underworld tradition is applicable in the 20 th<br />
century and forms the basis of one of the most profound forms of transformation<br />
33 Hollander, Lee The Poetic Edda (University of Texas Press; Austin, TX) 1964, p. 179.<br />
34 For a discussion of this see Ellis-Davidson’s Myths and Symbols in Pagan Europe, p. 122.