04.09.2013 Views

Untitled - Awaken Video

Untitled - Awaken Video

Untitled - Awaken Video

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5. The Underworld 135<br />

would not have only seemed foreign to the ancient Northern Europeans, but would<br />

have been considered foolish or insane. Anyone believing such was leaving himself<br />

open to attack, illness, and possibly even death. The idea that the Underworld is<br />

a fun, cute, and exciting place is becoming relatively pervasive in the latter half<br />

of the 20 th century, however, so anyone proffering the idea that there might be<br />

danger involved in the tradition will not only be viewed by the “authorities” as<br />

being slightly weird, but will also be lambasted by the newest generation of “psychic<br />

flower-children.”<br />

The Northern European Underworld is part of a worldview, a Germanic worldview<br />

to be precise, and in this worldview otherworldly beings, as with many in<br />

the Land of the Living, are potentially dangerous. Destruction and creation are<br />

side-by-side processes. The ancient Germanic peoples did not survive by hiding<br />

themselves in a quaint fairy-tale fantasy but by plowing their fields, butchering<br />

their animals, and fighting and killing off invading forces when necessary. Their<br />

worldview provided them with information regarding choices in the course of action.<br />

They lived their lives in the physical world as they interpreted it; they did not live<br />

a pretend life within the constructs of their imaginations.<br />

Another area of “wishful thinking” which is imposed by the New Age upon the<br />

Germanic worldview is that of reincarnation. The debate can (and really has) gone<br />

on endlessly about whether or not the ancient Germanic people believed in some<br />

concept which involved the transmigration of souls. This, for the most part, is an<br />

importation of the whole East-West connection thing (discussed in Chap. 2). It is a<br />

nice philosophy which involves the learning of life’s lessons over a cycle of lifetimes<br />

and will not really be dealt with here. It should be mentioned, though, that in some<br />

rare cases in sagaic and eddaic literature, an individual (or at least part of him) was<br />

reborn to carry out a specific task usually related to revenge or leadership. The two<br />

cases usually dredged up for “proof” of the belief of reincarnation are those of Helgi<br />

Hundingsbane 33 (from the Sigurd cycle) and of St. Ólaf 34 . Without belaboring the<br />

point, Helgi had an act of revenge which needed to be carried out, and St. Ólaf<br />

denied being reincarnated. The fact that the individual asking St. Ólaf about the<br />

possibility of reincarnation most probably relates to the idea that if a soul is not<br />

completely laid to rest, it will wander. Reincarnation, as it is commonly understood<br />

today, most likely did not have a place in the early Germanic worldview. The passing<br />

on of familial luck/ power through the hamingja, and unrestful souls, however, did.<br />

These ideas are presented above and in Chap. 2.<br />

On the other hand, the ancient Underworld tradition is applicable in the 20 th<br />

century and forms the basis of one of the most profound forms of transformation<br />

33 Hollander, Lee The Poetic Edda (University of Texas Press; Austin, TX) 1964, p. 179.<br />

34 For a discussion of this see Ellis-Davidson’s Myths and Symbols in Pagan Europe, p. 122.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!