04.09.2013 Views

Untitled - Awaken Video

Untitled - Awaken Video

Untitled - Awaken Video

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Midgard 87<br />

have taken this to mean that the poem itself is not representative of pre-Christian<br />

ethics. R. I. Page in Chronicles of the Vikings addresses this issue:<br />

“In recent years there have been attempts to divert much of this material<br />

to the post-Christian phase of the Viking Age, and indeed to as late as the<br />

twelfth century. . . . It is fairly clear, at any rate to the unbiased, that<br />

(whatever the date of its edition into a composite Hávamál) a good deal of<br />

the poem derives from earlier times. Also that a good deal of it illustrates<br />

aspects of the Viking Age not otherwise recorded, notably the life of the poor<br />

or underprivileged.” 38<br />

Regardless of whether “godless men” composed part of the poem, or that it came<br />

into its final edition during the post-Christian Era, the poem’s content is consistent<br />

with behaviors recorded in writings from Tacitus (in the 1st century CE) on up<br />

through the Age of the Saga (700 CE through 1300 CE). The phenomenon of the<br />

“godless man” seems to have been a by-product of the Viking Age possibly due to<br />

lack of exposure to one’s own homeland (community) and one’s cultural history, but<br />

it did not change the knowledge that one needed to interact with power/ luck.<br />

The conversion to Christianity apparently did not affect the common man’s<br />

knowledge/ worldview that one needed to interact with one’s environment in a<br />

harmonious fashion, and that resolution is a far better means to an end than all out<br />

extermination. Perhaps man had forgotten about the original war between the tribes<br />

of Gods, but the noble method of bringing such a problem to a good conclusion was<br />

held in the folk-memory to the point where the Scandinavian countries of Sweden,<br />

Norway, and even Finland, at least, have been able to maintain neutrality in the<br />

world political arena for most of the current millennium. And, although Christianity<br />

has been able to change the face of much folk philosophy it has been unable to wipe<br />

out completely the folk belief that one needs to interact honorably and respectfully<br />

with the spirits that also form a part of this world, whether ancestral, land/ water,<br />

or domestic.<br />

The so-called New Age has really been an attempt at turning the modern folk<br />

mind back toward a concern for the environment and the land; however, this same<br />

group of people has turned its view away from their own cultural heritage and<br />

towards eastern philosophies or Native American. Eastern, Native American, and<br />

Germanic philosophies, although having some things in common, are very different<br />

in both approach and practice. As mentioned earlier, the ultimate goal of the eastern<br />

philosophies is to blend into the One (the first bardo), but the goals of the ancient<br />

northern Europeans appear to have been to make peace with the third (everyday<br />

reality) and second bardos (hallucinations and “second-sight” being here equated)<br />

38 ibid. p. 140.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!