25.10.2013 Views

REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN OPERABLE UNIT 2, LANDFILL ...

REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN OPERABLE UNIT 2, LANDFILL ...

REMEDIAL ACTION WORK PLAN OPERABLE UNIT 2, LANDFILL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

,’<br />

Attachment A<br />

Responseto Commentsfrom<br />

CaliforniaIntegratedWaste Management Board<br />

Review of the Remedial Action Work Plan, April 3, 1996<br />

<strong>REMEDIAL</strong> <strong>ACTION</strong> <strong>WORK</strong> <strong>PLAN</strong><br />

<strong>OPERABLE</strong> <strong>UNIT</strong> 2 <strong>LANDFILL</strong> CLOSURE<br />

FORT ORD, CALIFORNIA<br />

TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION CONTRACT<br />

DACW05-95-D-0001<br />

DELlVERY ORDER NO. 0003<br />

General Response to Comments:<br />

The USACE, through the TERC contract, is constructing the landfill cap in accordance with<br />

approved documents including the Record of Decision (ROD) and approved Harding Lawson<br />

Associates (HLA) designs. The Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) is the primary deliverable,<br />

not the HLA design. However the design remains the same. International Technology<br />

- Corporation (IT) is incorporating constructibility improvements to the HLA design in the<br />

Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP). These improvements enhance the overall design approved<br />

by the Base Cleanup Team (BCT) and are meant to define those areas which deviate from the<br />

approved design. BCT approval is requested to adapt these improvements to the approved<br />

design.<br />

None of these improvements are changes to the basic design concepts and performance<br />

specifications approved in the HLA design documents. Therefore, no Explanation of Significant<br />

Differences (ESD) amendments are required to the ROD based on these constructibility<br />

improvements. The only ESD required to the ROD is currently under review by the EPA, state<br />

and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) which adds cleanup criteria to the areas to<br />

be consolidated.<br />

Language will be added to clearly reference the HLA design docurnents.except as they are<br />

needed by the improvements as shown in the wwp and specifically detailed in Table 6.1,<br />

Constructibility Improvements. Table 6.1 verbage will be enhanced to say that these<br />

improvements are incorporated in the RAWP.<br />

Again, no design changes impact the record of decision. In our opinion, there are no “sweeping<br />

design changes” being proposed. The design, in our opinion, is frozen as capped landfill areas<br />

within a low permeable liner and vegetative cover.<br />

SJ/4-23-96/SACTERC/FTORDOU2/CIWMB<br />

A-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!