18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. In-pool plate thickness measurements<br />

The plate thickness measurements were collected plate by plate, at each intercycle, on five<br />

axial and one transverse (at the MFP) profiles 3 (fig. 3a and 3b). Note that the measurements<br />

after the 2 nd cycle F230 are not available due to technical problems encountered on the inpool<br />

measurement device at that moment. The precision of these measurements is about 15<br />

µm.<br />

As can be seen in Fig. 3a, the plate 8044 testing oxidised UMo in Al+2.1%Si did not show<br />

abnormal swelling after the fourth cycle (peak BU estimated to ~38%). The thickness of both<br />

plates containing oxide coated UMo + Si increased normally as irradiation proceeded. The<br />

maximal thickness increase for the hottest plate (8044) was between 40 and 50 µm at the<br />

end of cycle F232, taking into account thickness measurement differences between axial and<br />

transverse profiles performed at MFP (see Fig. 3a).<br />

By comparison, Fig. 3b shows the thickness evolution of plate 8053 containing oxidised UMo<br />

particles dispersed in pure Al. Fig.3b indicates a more heterogeneous swelling, particularly<br />

during the 4 th cycle. Local thickness increases up to 70 µm have been measured. Same<br />

results are evidenced for the plate 8054. IRIS4 plates without silicon added to the Al matrix<br />

show a slightly higher swelling than those with 2.1%Si.<br />

Plate 8044 (UMo ox - 2.1 wt% Si)<br />

Plate 8053 (UMo ox - 0% Si)<br />

before<br />

axial points - before<br />

F229<br />

F231<br />

F232<br />

axial points - F232<br />

1370<br />

1360<br />

before<br />

F229<br />

F231<br />

F232<br />

1390<br />

1380<br />

1370<br />

1350<br />

1360<br />

Plate thickness (μm)<br />

1340<br />

1330<br />

1320<br />

Plate thickness (μm)<br />

1350<br />

1340<br />

1330<br />

1310<br />

1320<br />

1300<br />

1310<br />

1290<br />

1300<br />

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30<br />

transverse position (mm)<br />

Fig. 3a: In-pile evolution of the transverse<br />

thickness profiles of plate 8044 at MFP<br />

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30<br />

transverse position (mm)<br />

Fig. 3b: In-pile evolution of the transverse<br />

thickness profiles of plate 8053 at MFP<br />

5. Discussion<br />

IRIS4 experiment is currently testing for the first time the behaviour of oxidised UMo fuel<br />

dispersed in pure Al or in Al+2.1%Si alloy matrix using full-size plates.<br />

In order to discriminate both effects of oxide layer and silicon addition on the UMo irradiation<br />

behaviour, the average plate thickness versus the fission density is represented on Fig. 5,<br />

comparing results of IRIS2 (pure Al), IRIS3 (2.1%Si and 0.3%Al) and IRIS4. Fig. 4 reminds<br />

the heat flux history for these three IRIS experiments.<br />

At the current status of IRIS4 experiment, if we compare the behaviour of UMo fuel without<br />

Si, one can notice that no pillowing has occurred in IRIS4 plates whereas, at similar fission<br />

density and even lower temperature, large pillowing was already observed on IRIS2 plates<br />

(whose irradiation conditions were higher than IRIS3 ones). However, local thickness results<br />

from Fig. 3b could indicate a beginning of degradation of the oxidised UMo plates.<br />

3 These measurements are done in the OSIRIS reactor pool with a dedicated device, originally<br />

developed for the qualification of the U 3 Si 2 fuel.<br />

128 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!