18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 5 / 7<br />

Challenges<br />

When operating BR2, fresh fuel is initially loaded in a position at the periphery of the core and<br />

progressively moved towards the core center as the burnup accumulates. Furthermore, burnable<br />

poisons incorporated in the fuel help to mitigate the reactivity drop induced by the burnup.<br />

Fig.4: H1 core cross section<br />

and the Aluminium-water<br />

central plug<br />

The RJH fuel does not<br />

incorporated burnable<br />

poisons and there is only<br />

one possible irradiation<br />

position. Hence, in this<br />

irradiation, the challenge<br />

is to operate BR2 with a<br />

fuel element in its center,<br />

operating at a required<br />

power level, while still<br />

being able to operate the<br />

reactor at a convenient<br />

power level for the other<br />

users at the periphery.<br />

This is achieved by several means. First, there is the choice of materials surrounding the central<br />

fuel, a mixture aluminium-water which presents optimum absorption – moderation –<br />

transmission characteristics when the fuel is fresh and most reactive. Then, by playing on the<br />

number of Iridium production targets surrounding the central fuel, it is possible to compensate<br />

the decrease of reactivity of the central fuel caused by burnup accumulation and still operate<br />

BR2 at constant power. At the end of life, the aluminium-water mixture has to be replaced by<br />

beryllium, which was found better suited for depleted fuel.<br />

The accuracy of the BR2 load determination before each cycle will be a critical element for this<br />

irradiation.<br />

Power generated in the RJH Fuel Element<br />

The summary Table 1 contains the calculated power deposited into the cooling water between<br />

the fuel plates, and in both plugs. The total power in the fresh RJH fuel element was calculated<br />

for the model with Al plug in the central trap of the fuel element and for the power of BR2<br />

equal to Q BR2 =62 MW.<br />

Irradiation<br />

1 Fission and decay reactions 4.77 MW<br />

2 γ prompt in cooling water 61 kW<br />

3 γ prompt in Al cladding 77 kW<br />

4<br />

28 Al decay in the cladding 4 kW<br />

5 Deposit of energy by γ delayed emitted by fission products to 47 kW<br />

the cooling water and to Al cladding<br />

6 Total in fuel element, MW 5.0 MW<br />

Table 1. Thermal power in the RJH fuel element.<br />

262 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!