18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In that case, one can assume that oxidised UMo would hinder the interaction rate UMo/Al<br />

without really modifying its intrinsic characteristics. Behaviour of plates 8053 and 8054<br />

during the further cycles will definitely confirm or not this assumption.<br />

The behaviour of the two others plates (8043<br />

and 8044) testing the both contribution of the<br />

oxide layer and the Si addition is promising<br />

since the thickness increase of those plates<br />

is of the same order of magnitude as that of<br />

the IRIS3 plate 8021 containing Al+Si but<br />

irradiated at much lower heat flux (below 200<br />

W/cm² against more than 285 W/cm² for the<br />

IRIS4 plates).<br />

Until now, positive effect of 2.1%Si addition<br />

in the Al matrix is confirmed in higher<br />

irradiation conditions. The potential<br />

contribution effect of oxidised UMo particle<br />

should be discriminate in the further<br />

irradiation cycles.<br />

Peak Heat Flux (W.cm-2)<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Power history<br />

IRIS 2 (Pure Al) 2002<br />

IRIS 3 (Al+2.1%Si) 8021<br />

0 50 100 150<br />

Duration (days)<br />

Fig.4: IRIS2, IRIS3 and IRIS4 power<br />

history comparison<br />

IRIS 4 (UMo ox +2,1%Si) 8044<br />

Plate thickness increase (µm)<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

IRIS2 0%Si (U7MT2002)<br />

IRIS2 0%Si (U7MT2003)<br />

IRIS2 0%Si (U7MT2007)<br />

IRIS3 0,3%Si (U7MV8011)<br />

IRIS3 2,1%Si (U7MV8021)<br />

IRIS4 UMo ox - 2,1%Si (U7MZ8044)<br />

IRIS4 UMo ox - 2,1%Si (U7MZ8043)<br />

IRIS4 UMo ox - 0%Si (U7MZ8054)<br />

IRIS4 UMo ox - 0%Si (U7MZ8053)<br />

371 µm 1237 µm 1056 µm pillowing<br />

IRIS2 0% Si<br />

P < 230 W/cm²<br />

IRIS2 0% Si<br />

P < 240 W/cm²<br />

IRIS3 0,3% Si<br />

P < 183 W/cm²<br />

50<br />

IRIS3 2,1% Si<br />

P < 201 W/cm²<br />

0<br />

0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

Fission density (10 21 f/cm 3 UMo)<br />

Fig. 5: Plate swelling of IRIS2, IRIS3 and IRIS4 plates<br />

IRIS4 consists in four full-size plates with high uranium loading and U-7.3 wt %Mo oxidised<br />

atomised powder dispersed in pure or added with silicon aluminium matrix. In this latest<br />

IRIS4 experiment still on-going, a modification of the UMo/Al interface is considered. The<br />

concept of protective barrier with the use of an oxide layer surrounding UMo particles was<br />

promoted by out-of-pile results [10, 11].<br />

Up to now, the IRIS4 plates were irradiated during 58 EFPD at OSIRIS reactor at a peak<br />

power of more than 290 W.cm -2 . The first results show that in the tested conditions, i.e.<br />

fission density of about 2.5 10 21 f.cm -3 UMo, no pillowing occurred. For oxidised UMo fuel<br />

dispersed in pure Al, plate thicknesses have slightly more increased than for plates with Si<br />

added in Al.<br />

129 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!