18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Picture 2:<br />

Original sketch out from [6] to<br />

illustrate the tailor-made model of<br />

NBK for thermohydraulic calculations<br />

between the envolute shaped plates. It<br />

is shown a cross section of one<br />

cooling channel between two plates at<br />

the area of uranium density stepping<br />

(3.0 and 1.5 g/cc, s. arrow). The<br />

cooling channels are divided horizontally<br />

each into about 60 threads. Any<br />

thread sees a different heating from<br />

left and right side. What is not shown<br />

here are the finite elements in the<br />

cladding and the ‘meat’ layer which<br />

have the same edges as the threads and can transfer heat in both directions of the drawing.<br />

As long as the channel width is kept constant (as done here) there may not be regarded any mass exchange or<br />

friction between the channels. The threads are adjusted to the same pressure value at any height.<br />

For the actual work the code was now adapted for:<br />

f) Running different states of operation in series. The time steps to be used were now the same as those<br />

given by the former neutronic calculations, that simulated now 14 time steps from begin to end of the<br />

fully 60 FPDs operation of FRM II.<br />

The temperatures at the surfaces and in the coolant can now be written by the NBK code (together with the<br />

calculated channel dimensions) to a specific file and in series for all calculated time steps.<br />

4 Results<br />

Next a program for displaying the data has been adjusted to read the values written by the NBK code and to<br />

show the single temperature profiles for any of the time steps as well as an adapted integral, or better averaged<br />

value profile. This is shown next.<br />

There where taken rather conservative values for the operation during the calculated cycle. The water inlet<br />

temperature was fixed to 38°C. The velocity of the coolant between the plates was taken to be 17.5 m/s in<br />

average and the heat transfer coefficient was taken by the formula from Colburn with a wall temperature<br />

correction. The formula showed best results in comparable cases [7].<br />

The main result of this work is a more moderate maximum value for the time averaged wall temperature:<br />

• The temperature maxima are fairly smoothened in contrast to the power density with sharp peaks,<br />

that are input data here for the thermohydraulic NBK code.<br />

• There exist two regions on the plates of practically the same maximum time averaged temperature.<br />

Both maximum show up to be rather broad and are located at a height between -5cm and –<br />

20 cm relative to the core center plane. The first maximum is close to the inner side of the channel<br />

and the second one more to the channel center slightly inside the edge where the uranium<br />

density stepping occurs (about fluid element 45 in Picture 2).<br />

• The time averaged maximum temperatures for FRM II are calculated to be nominally 85°C when<br />

taking conservative water inlet temperatures of 38°C.<br />

227 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!