18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For emergency preparedness, considering the availability of documented emergency plans,<br />

performance of on-site and off-site drills and arrangements for external assistance in<br />

response, the Level is 3: The recommendation is fully implemented.<br />

For siting, considering the status of programmes for continuing site-related evaluation and<br />

surveillance to ensure continued safety acceptability during the operational life time of the<br />

research reactor, the Level is 0. The recommendation is not implemented; there is little or no<br />

progress towards implementation<br />

For design, construction and commissioning, considering the status of implementation of the<br />

recommendations in this paragraph, the Level is 3. The recommendation is fully<br />

implemented.<br />

For operation, maintenance, modification and utilization, considering the status of<br />

implementation of the recommendations in this paragraph, with attention to availability of<br />

safety related documentation, such as, operating limits and conditions manual, operational<br />

procedures, maintenance procedures, experiments clearance and approval, fresh and spent<br />

fuel management and surveillance procedures, waste management procedures, safety<br />

committees organization and functioning, technical documentation management procedures,<br />

the Level is 3. The recommendation is fully implemented.<br />

For extended shutdown, considering the availability and scope of a programme for<br />

management of the research reactors in this condition: fuel management and sub criticality<br />

assurance, waste management, surveillance on research reactors systems, personnel. the<br />

Level is 0: The recommendation is not implemented; there is little or no progress towards<br />

implementation.<br />

For decommissioning, considering the availability and scope of plans for decommissioning of<br />

the research reactor(s), the Level is 2. The recommendation is partially implemented with<br />

satisfactory progress towards full implementation.<br />

3. Conclusions<br />

Most of the results give a classification of Level 3 or Level 2, therefore, it is demonstrated<br />

that for the case of research reactors, Mexico has implemented an acceptable safety<br />

programme at the state, regulatory and operator level. Most of the experience for this case<br />

was obtained from the regulation of the two nuclear power reactors that are operating in<br />

Mexico, and operated by the state owned Federal Commission of Electricity, which is also<br />

regulated by CNSNS, and to which ININ is a Technical Support Organization.<br />

4. References<br />

[1] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, NUREG-1537, “Guidelines for Preparing<br />

and Reviewing Applications for the Licensing of Non-Power Reactors” (1996).<br />

[2] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION. “NRC Regulations, Title 10, Code of<br />

Federal Regulations Part 50”.<br />

388 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!