18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The µ-XRD measurements were performed in reflection mode, on the ID22 beam line at the<br />

ESRF (<strong>European</strong> Synchrotron Radiation Facility) in Grenoble (France). To fulfil safety<br />

requirements, samples were conditioned under kapton tape. The photon energy was set to<br />

17 keV and the beam size on the samples was of the order of 2x20 µm 2. The length of the<br />

beam print was positioned parallel to the reaction front and the sample was moved µm per<br />

µm, perpendicularly to this front, between each acquisition.<br />

3. Results<br />

3.1. SEM+EDS characterization of ILs<br />

As previously shown by M. Cornen et al. [4-5], in the conditions used in this work for<br />

performing interdiffusion annealings, the IL thickness decreases when the Si content in Al<br />

increases, with a threlshold value of about 5 wt%, beyond which an increase of the Si<br />

content doesn't lead to a significant additional decrease of the IL thickness. SEM+EDS<br />

characterizations have shown that this critical value of about 5 wt% is also linked to a<br />

significant change in the IL microstructure and composition. That's the reason why two cases<br />

were more particularly taken into consideration in this study :<br />

- U-Mo7/Al-Si2 couples (Si content : below the threshold value),<br />

- U-Mo7/Al-Si7 and U-Mo7/Al-Si10 couples (Si content : above the threshold value).<br />

The U-Mo7/Al-Si5 samples will also be shortly described.<br />

The results given below are valid for those annealed at 450°C but also for those which<br />

underwent a complementary heat treatment at 350°C. Indeed, no significant evolutions of the<br />

ILs compositions occurred during this complementary annealing. The ILs thicknesses can<br />

vary from one place to the other along the reaction interface, in the same sample or from one<br />

sample to another (for the same type of couple and the same annealing). This is due to a<br />

relatively high dispersion of the kinetics results, linked to the experimental procedure.<br />

All the elementary compositions, determined by EDS, are given in at%. They are only semiquantitative<br />

and, thus, must be considered caustiously especially when low concentrations<br />

are measured (of the order of one to a few at%, the accuracy of the measurements being<br />

estimated to about 1 at%).<br />

Figures 2 and 3 summarise the results obtained on U-Mo7/Al-Si2 and U-Mo7/Al-Si7 diffusion<br />

couples, as representative of the two main types of ILs that can be found in the studied<br />

samples :<br />

- Type 1 (Si content : from 2 to 5 wt%) : characterized by the absence of Si, close to the U-<br />

Mo side, a slight and progressive Si enrichment, in the intermediate part of the IL and a Si<br />

enrichment of the order of 13 at%, close to Al-Si.<br />

Al-Si2<br />

Third area<br />

U 17 Mo 2 Al 69 Si 13 (at%)<br />

R (Al+Si /U+Mo) ~ 4.4<br />

Thickness : ~ 12.5% of total IL one<br />

Second area<br />

From U 17 Mo 2 Al 81 to U 17 Mo 2 Al 78 Si 3 (at%)<br />

Thickness : ~ 75% of total IL one<br />

First area<br />

U 17 Mo 2 Al 81 (at%)<br />

100 µm Thickness : ~ 12,5% of total IL one<br />

Presence of periodic sub-layers<br />

UMo7<br />

Figure 2 : SEM+EDS typical results obtained on an U-Mo7/Al-Si2 diffusion couple.<br />

151 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!