18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig.2. Reflector element of JRR-4.<br />

The crack was found on the weld of the aluminum cladding on December 28th, 2007. A<br />

photograph of the cracked reflector element is shown in Fig.3. We investigated the reflector<br />

elements by visual examination, dimensional examination, fractography examination, etc. As<br />

the result, the main cause of the crack was concluded by growth of graphite reflector due to<br />

fast neutron irradiation. The growth was about 7 mm (dimensional change: about 1 %) in<br />

longitudinal direction. An excessive stress broke the weld of aluminum cladding, since the<br />

dimensional change exceeded the gap of 4 mm between top of the graphite reflector and the<br />

joint part. In the next phase, we carried out a radiographic testing of verifying other reflector<br />

element. This result showed that the most of the graphite reflector were grown in the aluminum<br />

cladding.<br />

When the cracked reflector element was designed, the gap size of graphite reflector was<br />

designed based on the irradiation data of nuclear grade graphite material of which irradiation<br />

temperature is above 350 ˚C. These irradiation data show that irradiation growth of about<br />

0.05 % happens only on the early stage of irradiation, while irradiation shrinkage proceeds with<br />

fast neutron irradiation by 10 25 n/m 2 after the early stage. The irradiation data of the IG-110<br />

graphite material indicates that the irradiation shrinkage is caused due to the fast neutron<br />

irradiation at high irradiation temperatures above 600 ˚C [1]. Irradiation behaviour of<br />

anisotropic graphite was reported that the growth was observed in perpendicular to the<br />

direction of extrusion at 225 ˚C and 250 ˚C [2].<br />

Reflector body<br />

Handle<br />

Crack<br />

Fig.3. Crack of the reflector element.<br />

310 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!