18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1. MCNP geometry model of fuel element with burnable absorber lumped in 36 wires<br />

or 3 slabs in the aluminium stiffeners.<br />

2.3 Optimization of burnable absorber composition<br />

The criteria for choice of optimal burnable absorber material was based on: (i) maximum<br />

efficiency (macroscopic absorption cross section; reactivity worth); (ii) maximum burn up<br />

rate; (iii) the daughter isotopes of the burnable poison should have small absorption<br />

macroscopic cross section compared to the cross section of their precursors; (iv) high<br />

melting point is preferable for the chosen burnable absorber. The best of these options<br />

should have high macroscopic effective absorption cross section in the beginning of cycle<br />

and burn up most rapidly in order to end the cycle with the lowest burn up penalty. Suitable<br />

burnable absorbers are cadmium, gadolinium, boron, samarium; also erbium and<br />

dysprosium. Europium and hafnium have high cross sections of daughter isotopes, therefore<br />

they were excluded as candidates for burnable absorber. Samarium possibly will be included<br />

as additional burnable absorber, mixed in the fuel meat as in the current fuel after the final<br />

selection of main burnable absorber. The burnable absorber samarium burns in ~ 2 days and<br />

it is added to the fuel with purpose to compensate the rapid production rate of xenon-135 at<br />

the reactor start-up.<br />

A comparative analysis of the macroscopic absorption cross sections, burn up rate,<br />

reactivity effects was performed for the selected burnable poisons and presented in [1-2].<br />

Three major candidates as burnable absorber for the new BR2 fuel were selected: Cd,<br />

Gd 2 O 3 , B 4 C. The preliminary evaluations with erbium did not show satisfactory results for the<br />

reactivity excess during the transition cores, therefore it was excluded from further studies.<br />

On the basis of the absorption properties of the considered 3 burnable absorbers it was<br />

concluded that reducing the wire diameter enhances the burn up rate.<br />

2.4 Comparison of BA absorption properties in transition cores<br />

Preliminary studies for the feasibility of the BR2 fuel cycle with different fuel types (HEU, 90%<br />

U5, 1.3 gU tot /cc, UAl x ; LEU, 20% U5, UMo, 8.5 and 7.5 gU tot /cc; LEU, 20% U5, U 3 Si 2 , 4.8<br />

gU tot /cc) and various burnable absorber options have been performed for the transition and<br />

fully converted cores. The reactivity excess during the transition and fully converted cores<br />

was evaluated and compared for the different burnable absorbers. The diameter of the wires<br />

has been varied between 0.2 mm and 0.6 mm with purpose to adjust the burn up rate of the<br />

poison to the desired reactivity excess for the different fuel types. The gain in reactivity is<br />

maximum (+3.30$) for UMo, 8.5 gU tot /cc with Cd-wires with diameter D=0.4 mm. The<br />

reactivity excess in UMo, 8.5 gU tot /cc with borated aluminium stiffeners is similar (+3.22 $) to<br />

the same core with Cd-wires with D=0.4 mm. The gain for UMo, 7.5 gU tot /cc is similar to the<br />

reference load (+0.36$). The preliminary calculations of the reactivity evolution of fully<br />

converted cores with cadmium wires (D=0.4 mm) have shown flattened reactivity evolution<br />

*AREVA-CERCA, a subsidiary of AREVA NP, an AREVA an SIEMENS company<br />

138 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!