18.02.2014 Views

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

RRFM 2009 Transactions - European Nuclear Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was ~ 1-2.5 and 1-2 μm correspondingly. UO 2 layer was being produced on fuel particles by<br />

oxidizing them at air, the layer thickness was ~ 0.3 μm.<br />

Foregoing fuel compositions were being used for fabricating the mini-elements of diameter ~<br />

10.88-11.0 and height ~ 5.07-5.28 mm.<br />

Mini-elements were being irradiated in the interior of the fuel assembly of IVV-2M reactor<br />

during 118 days at mean heat flux of 60 W/cm 2 . The mean fission rate was equal to 4.0×10 14<br />

fis./(cm 3·c). The mean fission density of 4.1 ×10 21 fis./cm 3 and the equivalent 235 U burn up of<br />

60% have been achieved to the irradiation end. The fuel composition temperature during<br />

irradiation process did not exceed 90ºC.<br />

Post-irradiation tests confirmed our suggestions [2,3]:<br />

• There were not visible failures on the mini-elements, the bulges on the claddings<br />

were not observed. Cracking of the composition was not observed in all cases.<br />

• Coating U-Mo particles by Nb and Zr-1% Nb alloy reduces the swelling of minielements<br />

(of the basic U-Mo/Al composition) with technically clean Al-0.3%Si matrix<br />

by 20-27%, and oxidizing – by ~45%.<br />

• Using the Al-12%Si alloy as the matrix and the particles without the coating leads to<br />

the swelling reducing by comparison with the basic composition by 20%, and using<br />

the UO 2 coatings – more than two times.<br />

• Coating the fuel particles by barrier metallic layers hinders to penetration of U and Mo<br />

atoms and also fission fragments from fuel to matrix.<br />

• Gas-filled pores were observed in the basic fuel composition both in the fuel particles<br />

and in the interaction layer which width was equal to ~5 μm.<br />

• The width of the interaction layer in U-9%Mo/UO 2 /Al fuel composition is less by ~10%<br />

only by comparison with the basic one, but pores are absent in this layer.<br />

• The interaction layer in U-9%Mo/Nb/Al fuel composition consists of two parts: the<br />

Internal one (remnants of Nb coating) with width of 1 μm and external one (Nb 3 Al,<br />

Nb 2 Al, NbAl 3 combinations) which width is equal to 3 μm. There are no pores in these<br />

layers.<br />

• The width of the interaction layer in U-9%Mo/Zr-1%Nb/Al fuel composition is ~1 μm.<br />

There are no pores in this layer also.<br />

• The mean width of the layer observed around the fuel particles in U-9%Mo/Al-12%Si<br />

fuel composition is equal to ~ 4.3 μm. This value is less by ~15% by comparison with<br />

the basic fuel composition. Gas-filled pores were not observed.<br />

• The mean width of the layer around the fuel particles in U-9%Mo/ UO 2 /Al-12%Si fuel<br />

composition is equal to ~3.3 μm. This value is less by ~30% by comparison with the<br />

basic fuel composition. Gas-filled pores are absent also.<br />

Thus, all barrier coatings which we used decrease the rate of (U,Mo)Al x layer growth. It<br />

should note that according to data of the post-reactor tests the thickness of oxidic layer of 0.3<br />

μm is insufficient for protection against the interaction between the Al matrix and components<br />

of the fuel particles.<br />

Based on these data and results of the calculations [4], we suggest the fuel elements of<br />

impregnated type for using as fuel elements for Russian research reactors instead of<br />

elements fabricated by the extrusion technique:<br />

• the impregnated fuel element of monolithic type with the Zr-1% Nb alloy cladding;<br />

• the fuel composition – the U-9% Mo particulates coated by the Nb protective layer;<br />

• the Al-12% Si alloy is used as the matrix material impregnated into the fuel element.<br />

The increased charge of fuel particulates (up to 65% of volume) is the main advantage of<br />

impregnated type fuel elements, this value is more than two times larger than analogous<br />

characteristic (29%) in extrusive type fuel elements. Moreover, the impregnated type fuel<br />

elements possess some other advantages as compared with extrusive type fuel elements<br />

with the Al cladding:<br />

• under the impregnating the mechanical interaction between the fuel particles, which is<br />

inevitable during the extrusion, is absent; moreover, the integrity of the protective<br />

metallic barrier on the particulates is preserved;<br />

157 of 455

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!