28.02.2014 Views

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introductory statistical <strong>physics</strong><br />

Count<strong>in</strong>g states <strong>in</strong> one system us<strong>in</strong>g another<br />

Fundamental to the PSSC approach is the attribution of the change <strong>in</strong> the number of microstates<br />

to the heat bath. This raises a number of new issues and has important consequences for the rest<br />

of the structure of the PSSC teach<strong>in</strong>g programme (see figure 3).<br />

Hav<strong>in</strong>g argued that the change <strong>in</strong> In 52 (though they use ‘probability’) of a gas is NkT In 2<br />

when it doubles its volume isothermally, they need to f<strong>in</strong>d a way of say<strong>in</strong>g that the same change<br />

of In 52 occurs <strong>in</strong> the heat bath that delivers heat AQ to the gas, so that the value of AS that<br />

really matters, that of the heat bath, is brought out. <strong>The</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t is that the entropy change of the<br />

gas is easy to calculate but is not what is wanted; while that of the heat bath is hard to calculate<br />

and is what is wanted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> trouble is that AQ/T is only equal to NkT In 2 if the change is reversible. PSSC thus have<br />

two major problems: to expla<strong>in</strong> what a reversible change is; and to expla<strong>in</strong> why, <strong>in</strong> a reversible<br />

change, 52 for the whole system is unchanged so that changes <strong>in</strong> 52 for the two parts of it are<br />

equal and opposite. As with Feynman, these problems arise out of try<strong>in</strong>g to do statistics without<br />

do<strong>in</strong>g statistics (or do<strong>in</strong>g, as here, very little).<br />

PSSC’s reversible and irreversible oscillations<br />

It cannot be said that PSSC’s solution to the necessity to say what reversibility is lacks <strong>in</strong>genuity<br />

(figure 4). A filmed demonstration (Ferretti) shows gas be<strong>in</strong>g made to oscillate <strong>in</strong> volume, by<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g coupled to an <strong>in</strong>verted pendulum. <strong>The</strong> decay of free oscillations is studied, with vary<strong>in</strong>g<br />

amounts of alum<strong>in</strong>ium foil surface exposed to the gas, so that oscillations are nearly adiabatic<br />

(no foil), nearly isothermal (much foil) and <strong>in</strong> between. At the two extremes, the damp<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

least, so suggest<strong>in</strong>g that isothermal and adiabatic changes could both be reversible.<br />

VY<br />

masses<br />

rnerr<br />

vo-<br />

Figure 4. PSSC gas oscillator.<br />

Figure S. PSSC marble mach<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Necessary and unnecessary statistics<br />

<strong>The</strong> PSSC strategy not only needs reversibility and irreversibility, but it needs to present them<br />

statistically. This they do ma<strong>in</strong>ly through the use, aga<strong>in</strong> on film,of another special pedagogic<br />

device, the marble mach<strong>in</strong>e (figure 5). <strong>The</strong> marble mach<strong>in</strong>e is a pair of channels which can carry<br />

marbles, each lead<strong>in</strong>g to a larger space with a gap between the two, all mounted on a tilt<strong>in</strong>g<br />

board. If marbles are started <strong>in</strong> one channel, they slowly become distributed between the two,<br />

as the board is tilted many times. Conceptually, much h<strong>in</strong>ges on the mach<strong>in</strong>e. It has to illustrate<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!