28.02.2014 Views

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> energy cris@<br />

TABLE 7. United States coal resource. Units are lo9 tonnes.<br />

Ultimate total production [6]<br />

High estimate 1486<br />

Low estimate 390<br />

Produced through 1972 (My estimate from Hubbert’s Figure 22)<br />

50<br />

Percentage of ultimate production produced through 1972<br />

Percentage of high estimate 3%<br />

Percentage of low estimate 13%<br />

Coal resource rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

High estimate 1436<br />

Low estimate 340<br />

Annual production rate, 1972 0.5<br />

Rate of export of coal, 1974<br />

0.06<br />

Annual production rate, 1974 0.6<br />

Annual production rate, 1976 0.665<br />

Table 8 shows the EETs of the high and low estimates of United States coal reserves for various<br />

rates of <strong>in</strong>crease of the rate of production as calculated from Eq. (6). If we use the conservative<br />

smaller estimate of American coal reserves, we see that the growth of the annual rate of consumption<br />

will have to be held below 3 per cent if we want coal to last until 2076 A.D. If we want coal<br />

to last 200 years, the rate of growth of annual consumption wil have to be held below 1 per cent.<br />

TABLE 8. Lifetime <strong>in</strong> years of United States coal (EET). <strong>The</strong> lifetime (EET) <strong>in</strong> years of United States coal<br />

reserves (both the high and low estimate of the United States Geological Survey - USGS) are shown<br />

for several rates of growth of production from the 1972 level of 0.5 X lo9 tonnes per year.<br />

Zero<br />

1%<br />

2%<br />

3%<br />

4%<br />

5%<br />

6%<br />

7%<br />

8%<br />

9%<br />

1 W O<br />

11%<br />

12%<br />

13%<br />

High Estimate (yr)<br />

2872<br />

339<br />

203<br />

149<br />

119<br />

99<br />

86<br />

76<br />

68<br />

62<br />

57<br />

52<br />

49<br />

46<br />

Low Estimate (yr)<br />

680<br />

205<br />

134<br />

102<br />

83<br />

71<br />

62<br />

55<br />

50<br />

46<br />

42<br />

39<br />

37<br />

35<br />

One obta<strong>in</strong>s an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the problem if one asks how long beyond the year 1910<br />

could coal production have cont<strong>in</strong>ued on the curve of exponential growth at the historic rate<br />

6.69 per cent per year of figure 3. <strong>The</strong> smaller estimate of United States coal would have been<br />

consumed around the year 1967 and the larger estimate would have expired around the year<br />

1990. Thus it is clear the use of coal as an energy source <strong>in</strong> 1980 and <strong>in</strong> the years to come is<br />

possible only because the growth <strong>in</strong> the annual production of coal was zero from 191 0 to about<br />

19 72!<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!