28.02.2014 Views

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>New</strong> Trends <strong>in</strong> Physics Teach<strong>in</strong>g IV<br />

This demonstration suggests to us that the <strong>in</strong>formation is encoded <strong>in</strong> the form of phase differences<br />

and immediately establishes two important po<strong>in</strong>ts. First (as <strong>in</strong> figure 3c) no <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

can be encoded about dimensions much less than a wavelength of the radiation used and so it is<br />

no use hav<strong>in</strong>g a superb ‘optical’ system to form an image if the wavelength is too large. Second,<br />

even if the radiation has been suitably chosen, it is still important to <strong>in</strong>clude all the waves from<br />

the object. For example, if <strong>in</strong> figure 3b the aperture of the optical system cuts out all the waves<br />

outside PQ, then the image wil be no better than the image formed <strong>in</strong> figure 3c with too long a<br />

wavelength. Figure 4 shows some photographs taken to illustrate what can happen when either<br />

the wavelength is too long or the aperture is too small. But to return to the patch of figure 2<br />

aga<strong>in</strong> - if there are phase differences, why cannot we see <strong>in</strong>terference fr<strong>in</strong>ges? Consider figure<br />

3a; it is rem<strong>in</strong>iscent of the arrangement for Young’s fr<strong>in</strong>ges and, under the right coherence<br />

conditions, would produce s<strong>in</strong>usoidal <strong>in</strong>terference fr<strong>in</strong>ges on the screen. If we now add all the<br />

other possible pairs of po<strong>in</strong>ts on the slide that make up the picture, each pair would produce a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>usoidal fr<strong>in</strong>ge pattern on the screen. With the experiment as described so far - us<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

ord<strong>in</strong>ary projector - we do not see a pattern because the light is both spatially and temporally<br />

<strong>in</strong>coherent. <strong>The</strong>re is <strong>in</strong> fact a pattern on the screen at any <strong>in</strong>stant - but it is a superposition of<br />

many patterns because of the spatial extent of the source (lack of spatial coherence) and it is<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g at an enormous rate with time. If the light used were coherent both temporally and<br />

spatially - as <strong>in</strong> our assumption for the theory - then the pattern of <strong>in</strong>terference bands would be<br />

stationary and visible, as <strong>in</strong>deed is shown (for the same slide) <strong>in</strong> figure 5.<br />

Figure 5. Repeat of the experiment used to produce figure 2, but now the slide is illum<strong>in</strong>ated by light that is temporally and<br />

spatially coherent (laser source).<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!