28.02.2014 Views

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

New trends in physics teaching, v.4; The ... - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Optics rega<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

Consider an ord<strong>in</strong>ary 35 mm slide placed <strong>in</strong> a projector (figure la). Clearly, one important<br />

plane is that of the slide and another is that of the screen. It is also obvious that (assum<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

projector to be a good one) there will be a very close relationship between the <strong>in</strong>tensity distribution<br />

at the slide and at the screen. But suppose we take any other plane parallel to the slide and<br />

located anywhere between the slide and the screen (figure 1 b). For every position there will be a<br />

different distribution - some may not resemble the slide <strong>in</strong> any way - others may be blurred<br />

representations of the slide (figure IC). But, if you pause to th<strong>in</strong>k about it for a moment, it must<br />

be obvious that the same <strong>in</strong>formation (i.e. all the <strong>in</strong>formation relat<strong>in</strong>g to the picture on that<br />

particular slide) must be present <strong>in</strong> every one of the <strong>in</strong>termediate planes. Let us go one stage<br />

further. Suppose we place the slide <strong>in</strong> the projector but we remove the projector lens (figure 2).<br />

<strong>The</strong> distribution of light on the screen wil be a more or less uniform patch of light and yet it<br />

must aga<strong>in</strong> follow that all the <strong>in</strong>formation about the slide must be there,(compare with the planes<br />

between the slide and the lens <strong>in</strong> figure 1). <strong>The</strong> patch of light on the screen can properly be<br />

described as a hologram s<strong>in</strong>ce every po<strong>in</strong>t on the screen conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation about every po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

on the slide. This is not a very useful k<strong>in</strong>d of hologram and we shall see later what we have to do<br />

to make it <strong>in</strong>to the powerful and excit<strong>in</strong>g device that most people th<strong>in</strong>k of <strong>in</strong> this connection.<br />

Figure 2. Patch of light on the screen at A with the arrangement as for figure la but with the projector lens removed; aga<strong>in</strong>, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the slide must be present <strong>in</strong> some form on the screen.<br />

What have we really established so far <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>physics</strong>? Merely that the first stage <strong>in</strong> one<br />

particular image-form<strong>in</strong>g process is that light <strong>in</strong>teracts with the object and all the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

needed to form the image is encoded <strong>in</strong> the light. In the second stage, the lens sorts out all this<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation and places it <strong>in</strong> the appropriate places on the screen to form an image. We may<br />

describe these two processes as encod<strong>in</strong>g and decod<strong>in</strong>g, as scatter<strong>in</strong>g and recomb<strong>in</strong>ation, as<br />

diffraction and focus<strong>in</strong>g, or even (loosely) as Fourier transformation and Inverse Fourier transformation.<br />

23 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!