op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
some of those persons who have already<br />
crossed it, including those of military age, are<br />
being sent back both by UNPROFOR and the<br />
Croatian authorities. It is extremely regrettable<br />
that UNPROFOR has been <strong>for</strong>ced to<br />
violate the principle of non-refoulement.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se incidents suggest a United Nations security apparatus—Sanctions<br />
Committee, UNPROFOR, and the Security<br />
Council itself—hostile to the protection and assistance needs<br />
of the war-torn region. In fact, concern <strong>for</strong> the well-being of<br />
civilian p<strong>op</strong>ulations played a newly prominent role in U.N.<br />
affairs—not only in the Balkans but also in northern Iraq,<br />
Somalia, and elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> difficulty was rather that the<br />
political and military strategies ad<strong>op</strong>ted did not advance the<br />
stated humanitarian goals.<br />
We review the extent to which the integrity of the U.N.’s<br />
humanitarian activities in the <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavia was compromised<br />
by their association with the world body’s political and<br />
military actions.<br />
Association with the Political<br />
In a series of resolutions, the Security Council imposed,<br />
reaffirmed, and tightened economic sanctions against the<br />
Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). In<br />
<strong>for</strong>bidding all trade, Resolution 757 of May 30, 1992 authorized<br />
the Sanctions Committee to allow the entry of foodstuffs,<br />
medical supplies, and UNPROFOR-related goods and services.<br />
Tightening the sanctions, Resolution 820 of April 17,<br />
1993 reaffirmed the earlier exemption <strong>for</strong> medical supplies<br />
and foodstuffs and added a category of “other essential humanitarian<br />
supplies,” which, like the other exceptions, would<br />
be approved as previously by the Sanctions Committee using<br />
a case-by-case, no-objection procedure.<br />
<strong>The</strong> economic sanctions, explained U.N. secretariat staff<br />
to the team, “were intended to change the attitudes and<br />
policies of the government or persons in authority, not to hurt<br />
innocent pe<strong>op</strong>le.” Yet they had three direct and three indirect<br />
impacts on civilian p<strong>op</strong>ulations and on those seeking to assist<br />
93