08.03.2014 Views

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

some of those persons who have already<br />

crossed it, including those of military age, are<br />

being sent back both by UNPROFOR and the<br />

Croatian authorities. It is extremely regrettable<br />

that UNPROFOR has been <strong>for</strong>ced to<br />

violate the principle of non-refoulement.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se incidents suggest a United Nations security apparatus—Sanctions<br />

Committee, UNPROFOR, and the Security<br />

Council itself—hostile to the protection and assistance needs<br />

of the war-torn region. In fact, concern <strong>for</strong> the well-being of<br />

civilian p<strong>op</strong>ulations played a newly prominent role in U.N.<br />

affairs—not only in the Balkans but also in northern Iraq,<br />

Somalia, and elsewhere. <strong>The</strong> difficulty was rather that the<br />

political and military strategies ad<strong>op</strong>ted did not advance the<br />

stated humanitarian goals.<br />

We review the extent to which the integrity of the U.N.’s<br />

humanitarian activities in the <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavia was compromised<br />

by their association with the world body’s political and<br />

military actions.<br />

Association with the Political<br />

In a series of resolutions, the Security Council imposed,<br />

reaffirmed, and tightened economic sanctions against the<br />

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). In<br />

<strong>for</strong>bidding all trade, Resolution 757 of May 30, 1992 authorized<br />

the Sanctions Committee to allow the entry of foodstuffs,<br />

medical supplies, and UNPROFOR-related goods and services.<br />

Tightening the sanctions, Resolution 820 of April 17,<br />

1993 reaffirmed the earlier exemption <strong>for</strong> medical supplies<br />

and foodstuffs and added a category of “other essential humanitarian<br />

supplies,” which, like the other exceptions, would<br />

be approved as previously by the Sanctions Committee using<br />

a case-by-case, no-objection procedure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> economic sanctions, explained U.N. secretariat staff<br />

to the team, “were intended to change the attitudes and<br />

policies of the government or persons in authority, not to hurt<br />

innocent pe<strong>op</strong>le.” Yet they had three direct and three indirect<br />

impacts on civilian p<strong>op</strong>ulations and on those seeking to assist<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!