08.03.2014 Views

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eneficiary p<strong>op</strong>ulation had been reached (and it was not), the<br />

amount available per person <strong>for</strong> all food, health, shelter, and<br />

social services needs would have been about $7 per month,<br />

including administrative overhead.<br />

<strong>The</strong> six subsequent appeals followed the same general<br />

pattern, with per capita requests edging upward. For the first<br />

six months of 1994, the resources requested <strong>for</strong> a planned<br />

beneficiary p<strong>op</strong>ulation of 800,000 in Croatia totaled $99.8<br />

million: that is, about $125 per person, or $21 per month. In<br />

Bosnia and Herzegovina, $270.3 million would be shared<br />

among 2,740,000 beneficiaries <strong>for</strong> about $100 per person, or<br />

$16 per month. For p<strong>op</strong>ulations, particularly in eastern and<br />

central Bosnia, who were largely or totally dependent upon<br />

outside assistance <strong>for</strong> everyday essentials, these figures were<br />

paltry.<br />

United Nations officials were well aware of the facts. For<br />

example, requesting $522.6 million <strong>for</strong> U.N. activities during<br />

the first half of 1994, the latest Consolidated Appeal confirmed<br />

that it “does not attempt to assess and respond to the totality<br />

of needs throughout the <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavia, but rather focuses<br />

upon those which are within the capacity and competence of<br />

its agencies and their partners to deliver and implement.” <strong>The</strong><br />

caveat represents a major concession in what should have<br />

been a comprehensive and inclusive approach. Rather than<br />

describing existing needs, U.N. officials sought to keep their<br />

requests “realistic.” Even then the funds requested, if received,<br />

would have been hard-pressed to do the job described.<br />

U.N. programs throughout the region were not funded<br />

“on the cheap.” Significant resources were provided by donor<br />

governments, (see Figure 2.3 on page 32), and were supplemented<br />

by funds raised from other constituencies, including<br />

NGOs. As with other major United Nations <strong>op</strong>erations that<br />

combine peacekeeping and humanitarian activities, however,<br />

the lion’s share of the resources went to UNPROFOR. <strong>The</strong><br />

question remains whether, given limited resources, more could<br />

have been accomplished had they been differently allocated.<br />

Even without further analysis, it is clear from the Balkan<br />

mathematics that the programs planned, like the assumptions<br />

of the planning process itself, were unrealistic from the outset.<br />

If the U.N.’s decision not to challenge donor governments<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!