op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
op 18 front pages-converted - The Watson Institute for International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
eneficiary p<strong>op</strong>ulation had been reached (and it was not), the<br />
amount available per person <strong>for</strong> all food, health, shelter, and<br />
social services needs would have been about $7 per month,<br />
including administrative overhead.<br />
<strong>The</strong> six subsequent appeals followed the same general<br />
pattern, with per capita requests edging upward. For the first<br />
six months of 1994, the resources requested <strong>for</strong> a planned<br />
beneficiary p<strong>op</strong>ulation of 800,000 in Croatia totaled $99.8<br />
million: that is, about $125 per person, or $21 per month. In<br />
Bosnia and Herzegovina, $270.3 million would be shared<br />
among 2,740,000 beneficiaries <strong>for</strong> about $100 per person, or<br />
$16 per month. For p<strong>op</strong>ulations, particularly in eastern and<br />
central Bosnia, who were largely or totally dependent upon<br />
outside assistance <strong>for</strong> everyday essentials, these figures were<br />
paltry.<br />
United Nations officials were well aware of the facts. For<br />
example, requesting $522.6 million <strong>for</strong> U.N. activities during<br />
the first half of 1994, the latest Consolidated Appeal confirmed<br />
that it “does not attempt to assess and respond to the totality<br />
of needs throughout the <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavia, but rather focuses<br />
upon those which are within the capacity and competence of<br />
its agencies and their partners to deliver and implement.” <strong>The</strong><br />
caveat represents a major concession in what should have<br />
been a comprehensive and inclusive approach. Rather than<br />
describing existing needs, U.N. officials sought to keep their<br />
requests “realistic.” Even then the funds requested, if received,<br />
would have been hard-pressed to do the job described.<br />
U.N. programs throughout the region were not funded<br />
“on the cheap.” Significant resources were provided by donor<br />
governments, (see Figure 2.3 on page 32), and were supplemented<br />
by funds raised from other constituencies, including<br />
NGOs. As with other major United Nations <strong>op</strong>erations that<br />
combine peacekeeping and humanitarian activities, however,<br />
the lion’s share of the resources went to UNPROFOR. <strong>The</strong><br />
question remains whether, given limited resources, more could<br />
have been accomplished had they been differently allocated.<br />
Even without further analysis, it is clear from the Balkan<br />
mathematics that the programs planned, like the assumptions<br />
of the planning process itself, were unrealistic from the outset.<br />
If the U.N.’s decision not to challenge donor governments<br />
75