2013-2016 Technology Plan - Osceola County School District
2013-2016 Technology Plan - Osceola County School District
2013-2016 Technology Plan - Osceola County School District
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Administrative and Instructional <strong>Technology</strong><br />
installing and implementing new instructional materials. Currently, the district supports a wide variety of<br />
software applications. Please refer to Exhibit 6-10.<br />
Exhibit 6-10<br />
Summary of Instructional Applications Supported in 2000-2001<br />
Software Application<br />
Number of<br />
<strong>School</strong>s<br />
Number of<br />
Students<br />
Number of<br />
Teachers<br />
Number of<br />
Staff<br />
Accelerated Reader 34 37,000 2,000 500<br />
STAR Reading 31 25,000 1,125 375<br />
Pinnacle Excelsior Gradeboook 12 20,000 1,025 60<br />
STAR Math 16 16,000 720 240<br />
Accelerated Math 13 13,000 585 195<br />
Compass Learning 13 10,000 294 5<br />
Read 180 5 6,000 325 20<br />
Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) 5 4,000 205 25<br />
Classworks 3 3,000 210 15<br />
Computer Curriculum Corporation (CCC) 20 3,000 5 15<br />
A Plus 3 1,200 22 3<br />
Scholastic Wiggleworks 6 900 30 30<br />
PLATO Education Services 9 550 9 2<br />
Waterford Early Reading Program 2 80 4 4<br />
Source: <strong>Osceola</strong> <strong>District</strong> Media and Instructional <strong>Technology</strong> Department, March 2002.<br />
According to the 2001 <strong>Technology</strong> Resources Survey, other software supported by schools in the include<br />
Carnegie Cognitive Tutor, Cornerstone/SkillsBank, Ellis, Lightspan, Magellan, Math Keys, Nova Net,<br />
Reading Counts, Riverdeep, and Sequoyah.<br />
Providing support for too many software applications can be a costly burden to the district, and<br />
purchasing licenses for applications that are underutilized is costly. Cost savings can be realized by<br />
evaluating the use and effectiveness of these applications. The focus of the evaluation should be in how<br />
well the application meets district performance goals. The district should then focus its limited resources<br />
on supporting only those packages that best meet performance expectations.<br />
On average, over the last four years, the district has spent an average of approximately $681,000 per year<br />
on software. 6 We believe the district can cut costs as much as 5% by systematically evaluating and<br />
analyzing the usage of currently supported software so that less effective and underutilized applications<br />
are eliminated from the inventory, thereby ensuring that the number of licenses and level of third party<br />
support is appropriate.<br />
Asset management-technology resources<br />
Tracking the utilization of technology resources is beneficial because the overhead of housing and<br />
maintaining underutilized technology resources is costly. The opportunity cost of keeping underutilized<br />
hardware exists because the space that underutilized hardware takes up could be freed for classroom use<br />
and storage. Asset management applications exist to track the utilization of technology resources but the<br />
successful implementation of the application often depends on the level of standardization. Because asset<br />
management applications track utilization of resources running under the same operating system, the first<br />
step is to meet standardization goals. When considering the purchase of an asset management<br />
application, the purchase price of the application should be offset with the value of the man hours saved<br />
6<br />
From Purchasing Department records; includes administrative and instructional software.<br />
OPPAGA 6-15<br />
<strong>2013</strong> Educational <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> 15/40 <strong>School</strong> <strong>District</strong> of <strong>Osceola</strong> <strong>County</strong> Florida