28.06.2014 Views

The role of metacognitive skills in learning to solve problems

The role of metacognitive skills in learning to solve problems

The role of metacognitive skills in learning to solve problems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem <strong>solve</strong>r has declarative knowledge about the doma<strong>in</strong> at<br />

its disposal. This doma<strong>in</strong>-dependent component holds relevant task and<br />

problem solv<strong>in</strong>g activities. Various cognitive activities are employed<br />

by the problem <strong>solve</strong>r such as def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the problem, decid<strong>in</strong>g which<br />

(sub)problem <strong>to</strong> work on, reason<strong>in</strong>g and evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the solution.<br />

<strong>The</strong> dialogue processor conta<strong>in</strong>s knowledge about different types <strong>of</strong><br />

dialogue acts and the communicative functions there<strong>of</strong>. With the knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the dialogue processor, the learner knows how <strong>to</strong> hand over<br />

knowledge <strong>to</strong> the partner and how <strong>to</strong> obta<strong>in</strong> knowledge. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

the dialogue processor decides upon the form and function <strong>of</strong> the dialogue<br />

act based upon specific dialogue goals such as confirm<strong>in</strong>g, reject<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or accept<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>formation transfer <strong>of</strong> the partner.<br />

<strong>The</strong> alter component conta<strong>in</strong>s a model <strong>of</strong> the partner with whom<br />

problem solv<strong>in</strong>g is undertaken. <strong>The</strong> model conta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>formation about<br />

which activities the partner recently has undertaken, the goals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

partner and his or her expectations.<br />

<strong>The</strong> CFP conta<strong>in</strong>s rules and procedures. <strong>The</strong> CFP is the gateway <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction between the other components and it controls and moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

the <strong>in</strong>formation exchange with the external world. It decides how the <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>in</strong> the other components should be comb<strong>in</strong>ed and which <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

should be communicated <strong>to</strong> the human problem solv<strong>in</strong>g partner.<br />

It generates goal structures for the other components.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction component is the door <strong>to</strong> the external world that<br />

translates <strong>in</strong>ternal representations and goals <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> verbal communication.<br />

It is a natural language <strong>in</strong>terface that connects the partner <strong>to</strong> the system.<br />

It also translates <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal representations that<br />

can be processed by the central focus<strong>in</strong>g processor and the other components.<br />

Some issues that follow from the implementation <strong>of</strong> the model <strong>in</strong> the<br />

simulation are worth mention<strong>in</strong>g with respect <strong>to</strong> metacognition. <strong>The</strong><br />

problem <strong>solve</strong>r aims at solv<strong>in</strong>g the problem <strong>in</strong> a doma<strong>in</strong>-dependent way.<br />

However, its functionality is based on a compiled model (such as described<br />

by Mettes & Pilot and Hamel) <strong>of</strong> problem solv<strong>in</strong>g with generic<br />

activities such as check<strong>in</strong>g whether sub<strong>problems</strong> still exist or decid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which subproblem <strong>to</strong> <strong>solve</strong> next.<br />

Erkens argues that the CFP is the <strong>metacognitive</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> the model,<br />

its function concerns coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g and delegat<strong>in</strong>g tasks <strong>to</strong> the various<br />

components. In order <strong>to</strong> do this the CFP either reacts on or <strong>in</strong>itiates<br />

a dialogue. This functionality, <strong>to</strong>o, is concerned with regulat<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

<strong>of</strong> the system. One could argue that it therefore also resembles<br />

a compiled task model.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!