24.07.2014 Views

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

94 Chapter 4<br />

The mean residuals for <strong>the</strong> two orbits are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 4.7. Many of <strong>the</strong> features related to <strong>the</strong><br />

undersampl<strong>in</strong>g error disappear. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mean residuals can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong><br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum length solution <strong>in</strong> Eq. (4.14) fits <strong>the</strong> solar and earthsh<strong>in</strong>e measurement <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g its noise.<br />

Thus <strong>the</strong> retrieved solar spectrum is biased by <strong>the</strong> particular noise pattern of <strong>the</strong> GOME earthsh<strong>in</strong>e and<br />

solar measurements that are used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> retrieval. However, biases that differ for <strong>the</strong> measurements<br />

of <strong>the</strong> considered orbit may also result <strong>in</strong> such a spectral bias. The standard deviation of <strong>the</strong> mean<br />

residual (depicted <strong>in</strong> light gray) does not differ significantly from <strong>the</strong> one us<strong>in</strong>g our first approach (see<br />

Fig. 4.6).<br />

Figure 4.7: Same as Fig. 4.6 ((a) 24 earthsh<strong>in</strong>e spectra <strong>in</strong> 80702165, (b) 120 earthsh<strong>in</strong>e spectra <strong>in</strong><br />

81003031), but us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> retrieved solar spectrum from <strong>the</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong> solar measurement and<br />

one earthsh<strong>in</strong>e measurement.<br />

In both approaches, <strong>the</strong> retrieved values for <strong>the</strong> shift ∆λ were very small, i.e. -1.86 ×10 −3 to<br />

+1.01×10 −3 nm with a retrieval error of approximately 1×10 −5 nm. The residuals did not improve<br />

significantly by add<strong>in</strong>g ∆λ to <strong>the</strong> state vector, and thus one could decide to leave out this relative<br />

shift. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> wavelength calibration of GOME is accurately enough as it is to achieve<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Earth radiance spectra close to <strong>the</strong> noise level for <strong>the</strong> range 390–400 nm with our<br />

method. For o<strong>the</strong>r spectral ranges with absorption features of atmospheric trace gases, <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

shift ∆λ might be of more importance ow<strong>in</strong>g to a difference <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wavelength calibration of GOME<br />

and of <strong>the</strong> absorption cross sections of <strong>the</strong> relevant trace gases.<br />

Thus, so far, only <strong>the</strong> residuals for <strong>the</strong> measurements over land have been shown. This is because<br />

our forward model does account for vector radiative transfer <strong>in</strong> an <strong>atmosphere</strong> bounded below by a<br />

Lambertian surface, but does not <strong>in</strong>clude underwater light <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean. When we apply

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!