Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON
Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON
Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A doubl<strong>in</strong>g-add<strong>in</strong>g method to <strong>in</strong>clude multiple orders of rotational <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> 19<br />
sented by Kattawar et al. [1981]. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>n, several radiative transfer models were presented which<br />
account for multiple <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>, but <strong>in</strong>clude one order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. The radiative transfer<br />
models of Jo<strong>in</strong>er et al. [1995, 2004], and of Sioris and Evans [2002b] are based on a successive order<br />
of <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> scheme which calculates <strong>the</strong> contribution of each order of <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> for a Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
model <strong>atmosphere</strong>. Each <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> order is <strong>the</strong>n corrected for one possible <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
event. The models provide <strong>the</strong> exact s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> solution <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
For <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> second and higher <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> orders, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> source<br />
function has to be simplified to achieve a feasible numerical implementation [Jo<strong>in</strong>er et al., 1995,<br />
2004, Sioris and Evans, 2002b]. A different approach was presented by Vountas et al. [1998] and<br />
Landgraf et al. [2004] (see Chapter 3). Both models divide <strong>the</strong> radiative transfer equation <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g equation for a Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>atmosphere</strong> and a<br />
perturbation term. The effect of this perturbation on <strong>the</strong> solution of <strong>the</strong> Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> problem<br />
is described by Vountas et al. [1998] with a Picard series, whereas Landgraf et al. [2004] use a Dyson<br />
series known from perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory. The truncation of both series takes place <strong>in</strong> first order, which<br />
<strong>in</strong> both cases corresponds to one order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
The first model approach account<strong>in</strong>g for two orders of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> was presented by Stam<br />
et al. [2002] who use <strong>the</strong> analytical solution for an <strong>atmosphere</strong> layer with second order <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
Therefore, two <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> processes are also <strong>in</strong>cluded. This vector model produces <strong>the</strong> differential<br />
R<strong>in</strong>g effect structures well. The cont<strong>in</strong>uum height was calculated with a separate doubl<strong>in</strong>gadd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
model that takes multiple elastic Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>to account.<br />
In this paper, we present an extension of <strong>the</strong> add<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> which is<br />
not limited with respect to <strong>the</strong> order of <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. In Section 2, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory of <strong>the</strong> doubl<strong>in</strong>gadd<strong>in</strong>g<br />
method is extended to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. Then, <strong>in</strong> Section 3, we discuss <strong>the</strong> numerical<br />
implementation of <strong>the</strong> method. In Section 4 we present fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> results for a model of <strong>the</strong> Earth’s<br />
<strong>atmosphere</strong> at 0.2 nm spectral resolution. For <strong>the</strong> first time, we quantify <strong>the</strong> contribution of multiple<br />
<strong>in</strong>elastically scattered radiation. Then, <strong>in</strong> Section 5, we compare <strong>the</strong> extended doubl<strong>in</strong>g-add<strong>in</strong>g model<br />
with <strong>the</strong> model of Landgraf et al. [2004], which takes one order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>to account, but<br />
which compensates for <strong>the</strong> neglect of multiple <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> to a certa<strong>in</strong> degree. We summarize<br />
our f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Section 6.<br />
2.2 The add<strong>in</strong>g method <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />
The <strong>in</strong>teraction of radiation with <strong>the</strong> Earth’s <strong>atmosphere</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Earth’s surface is described by <strong>the</strong><br />
radiative transfer equation. In its scalar approach, <strong>the</strong> radiative transfer equation neglects any polarization<br />
aspects of light. Therefore, <strong>the</strong> radiation field is characterized by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity field I only.<br />
This approach simplifies <strong>the</strong> radiative transfer problem extensively. Although it is known that <strong>the</strong><br />
scalar approximation <strong>in</strong>troduces errors [Chandrasekhar, 1960, Lacis et al., 1998, Hasekamp et al.,<br />
2002], it is well suited to study <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cipal effect of multiple orders of <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>.<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we know that rotational <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> has a m<strong>in</strong>or effect on <strong>the</strong> Stokes parameters<br />
Q, U and V , and that <strong>the</strong> errors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g structures <strong>in</strong> I <strong>in</strong>troduced by <strong>the</strong> scalar approach are