24.07.2014 Views

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

Rotational Raman scattering in the Earth's atmosphere ... - SRON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128<br />

<strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. This model is described <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2 and is based on <strong>the</strong> doubl<strong>in</strong>g-add<strong>in</strong>g method. The<br />

doubl<strong>in</strong>g-add<strong>in</strong>g equations were extended to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. One of <strong>the</strong> questions that we<br />

were particularly <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> was to what extent higher orders of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> are important for<br />

model<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g effect <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ultraviolet and visible wavelength range. Us<strong>in</strong>g a somewhat simplified<br />

model <strong>atmosphere</strong> that consisted of two layers and assum<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>strument spectral resolution similar<br />

to GOME, we found that <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> due to one order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> can be as high as 21% at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Ca II K and H l<strong>in</strong>es at 393 nm and 397 nm. The observed multiple <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> contribution<br />

to <strong>the</strong> total fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> is only 0.6% at <strong>the</strong>se l<strong>in</strong>es. Near 325 nm molecular <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is stronger, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fraunhofer l<strong>in</strong>es are less pronounced than <strong>the</strong> Ca II l<strong>in</strong>es. Here, <strong>the</strong> contributions of s<strong>in</strong>gle and<br />

multiple <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> to <strong>the</strong> total fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> are typically 4% and 0.2%, respectively. From this<br />

we concluded that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of GOME-type measurements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g one order of <strong>in</strong>elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

is sufficient for most applications.<br />

In Chapter 3 we <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> polarization aspects of <strong>the</strong> light that emerges from a molecular<br />

<strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>atmosphere</strong>. The impact of neglect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> polarization aspects was verified with a newly<br />

developed vector radiative transfer model. This model employs radiative transfer perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory<br />

and treats <strong>in</strong>elastic rotational <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> as a perturbation to elastic Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> (i.e.<br />

<strong>the</strong> approximation <strong>in</strong> which all light <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is assumed to be elastic). The approach provides<br />

a perturbation series expansion for a simulated radiation quantity, where each term describes <strong>the</strong><br />

effect of one additional order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong>. The model was worked out <strong>in</strong> detail to first<br />

order. Here, <strong>the</strong> adjo<strong>in</strong>t formulation of radiative transfer reduces <strong>the</strong> numerical effort of computational<br />

applications significantly. Numerical simulations were presented for <strong>the</strong> ultraviolet part of <strong>the</strong> solar<br />

spectrum and <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Stokes parameters I, Q and U of <strong>the</strong> reflected<br />

sunlight was studied. It was found that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g effect on a spectrum of <strong>the</strong> degree<br />

of l<strong>in</strong>ear polarization, √ Q 2 + U 2 /I, is largely determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> structures <strong>in</strong> a spectrum<br />

of I. The fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> structures <strong>in</strong> spectra of Q and U are less important. Two common approximations<br />

were tested for <strong>the</strong> simulation of <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g effect structures <strong>in</strong> GOME-type measurements: <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

<strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> approximation and <strong>the</strong> scalar approximation. We found that <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> approach<br />

does not produce <strong>the</strong> correct amplitude of <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g effect structures. For example, <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> of<br />

Ca II Fraunhofer l<strong>in</strong>es is underestimated by a factor 2. This means that both for <strong>the</strong> simulation of <strong>the</strong><br />

reflectivity cont<strong>in</strong>uum spectrum and for <strong>the</strong> calculation of <strong>the</strong> one order of <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> correction<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion of multiple Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> is crucial. Next we <strong>in</strong>vestigated <strong>the</strong> approximation <strong>in</strong><br />

which <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g effect structures were calculated with a scalar model, but <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> reflectance<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uum spectrum was simulated with a vector model. It was found that for most applications this<br />

approximation is justified s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> biases that are <strong>in</strong>troduced are typically one order of magnitude<br />

smaller than <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>strument noise. Only <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> strong Ca II Fraunhofer l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g<br />

structures on both I and Q should be <strong>in</strong>corporated.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> simulation of <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g structures <strong>in</strong> GOME-type measurements it is of crucial importance<br />

to use an accurate solar irradiance spectrum as model <strong>in</strong>put. In addition to <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g structures <strong>the</strong><br />

reflectivity spectra that are measured by GOME-type <strong>in</strong>struments conta<strong>in</strong> high frequency spectral<br />

structures that are <strong>in</strong>troduced by a Doppler shift between <strong>the</strong> Earth radiance and solar irradiance<br />

spectrum. These features are <strong>the</strong> result of <strong>in</strong>terpolat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> GOME solar irradiance spectrum to <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!