60 Chapter 3 where I ram,app and I ray,app are approximate radiance spectra and I ray,vec is <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g radiance spectrum simulated with <strong>the</strong> vector model. Figure 3.8 shows <strong>the</strong> errors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g spectra R I,ssc , R Q,ssc , and R U,ssc . As expected, below 300 nm R<strong>in</strong>g structures are reproduced well by this approximation due to <strong>the</strong> small fraction of multiple <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> events at <strong>the</strong>se wavelengths. With <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease of multiple <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> toward longer wavelengths also <strong>the</strong> error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g spectra <strong>in</strong>creases. For <strong>the</strong> radiance component <strong>the</strong> absolute error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> R<strong>in</strong>g spectra is generally less than 4% but can reach 7% at <strong>the</strong> Ca II l<strong>in</strong>es for ϑ 0 =70 ◦ . Keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> of this Fraunhofer l<strong>in</strong>es is about 12%, this represents a clear bias of more than a factor of 2 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> simulation of R<strong>in</strong>g spectra. For <strong>the</strong> polarization components relatively large errors occur <strong>in</strong> R Q,ssc for a solar zenith angle ϑ 0 =10 ◦ . This fact confirms <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation that for this particular case R<strong>in</strong>g structures are ma<strong>in</strong>ly produced by elastic <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> processes follow<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>Raman</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> event. Obviously, this effect cannot be simulated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> approximation. For <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r polarization R<strong>in</strong>g spectra, where this propagation effect is of m<strong>in</strong>or importance, <strong>the</strong> differences are much smaller and generally below 0.2%. Ano<strong>the</strong>r widely used approximation method, if only radiances need to be simulated, is <strong>the</strong> scalar radiative transfer approach. The advantage of this approach is that it takes <strong>in</strong>to account multiple <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> of light but at <strong>the</strong> same time greatly simplifies <strong>the</strong> calculations, which reduces <strong>the</strong> computational cost. However, neglect<strong>in</strong>g polarization can cause errors <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> modeled radiance of up to 10% [Chandrasekhar, 1960, Mishchenko et al., 1994, Lacis et al., 1998, Hasekamp et al., 2002]. The upper panel of Fig. 3.9 shows <strong>the</strong> error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiance component I. In <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> doma<strong>in</strong> below approximately 300 nm <strong>the</strong> error is very small. For s<strong>in</strong>gly scattered light <strong>the</strong> scalar approximation yields <strong>the</strong> same radiance as <strong>the</strong> vector approach, because <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g sunlight can be assumed unpolarized [Hansen and Travis, 1974a]. However, if a second <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> process takes place, which is very likely for wavelengths longer than 300 nm (see Fig. 3.7), <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g light for this process is strongly polarized (see e.g. Mishchenko et al. [1994]). The radiance of this second order scattered light does not depend only on <strong>the</strong> radiance component of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g light but also on its Stokes parameters Q and U. Hence, a neglect of polarization leads to an <strong>in</strong>correct value of <strong>the</strong> modeled radiance. The same is true for higher order <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> but here <strong>the</strong> effect is smaller. In Fig. 3.9 magnitude and sign of <strong>the</strong> error <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scalar radiative transfer depend additionally on <strong>the</strong> <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> geometry and on <strong>the</strong> orientation of successive <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> processes [Mishchenko et al., 1994]. For <strong>the</strong> simulation of R<strong>in</strong>g spectra R I,sca <strong>the</strong> scalar approach is much more exact than for simulations of <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uum. The errors, shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.9 are mostly below 0.1% and reach <strong>the</strong>ir maximum of 0.14% for <strong>the</strong> Ca II l<strong>in</strong>es for ϑ 0 = 70 ◦ . Aga<strong>in</strong>, compared with <strong>the</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Fraunhofer l<strong>in</strong>e of 12% this represents a bias of only a factor of about 1.01. The high accuracy can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>Raman</strong> scattered light is less polarized and so <strong>the</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Stokes parameters due to <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> processes is of m<strong>in</strong>or importance for <strong>the</strong> simulation of R<strong>in</strong>g spectra <strong>in</strong> I.
A vector radiative transfer model us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> perturbation <strong>the</strong>ory approach 61 Figure 3.9: (upper panel) Relative error δI ray <strong>in</strong> simulated radiance spectra I ray due to <strong>the</strong> scalar approximation of radiative transfer, δI ray = (I ray,sca − I ray,vec )/I ray,vec . (lower panel) Difference D I,sca <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> radiance R<strong>in</strong>g spectra R I,sca and R I,vec for scalar and vector radiative transfer simulations, respectively, D I,sca = R I,sca − R I,vec . Here, both R<strong>in</strong>g spectra are normalized to <strong>the</strong> radiance spectrum of a Rayleigh <strong>scatter<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>atmosphere</strong> simulated with <strong>the</strong> vector radiative transfer model. The model <strong>atmosphere</strong>, surface albedo, and solar and view<strong>in</strong>g geometry is <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3.2.
- Page 1 and 2:
VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT Rotational Raman
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Obser
- Page 7 and 8:
1 Introduction 1.1 Observing skylig
- Page 9 and 10:
Introduction 3 Extracting the wealt
- Page 11 and 12:
Introduction 5 and Spurr, 1997, Vou
- Page 13 and 14:
Introduction 7 energy: E rot (v,J)
- Page 15 and 16: Introduction 9 Figure 1.4: Probabil
- Page 17 and 18: Introduction 11 scattered radiance
- Page 19 and 20: Introduction 13 approximation in wh
- Page 21 and 22: Introduction 15 scattering have bee
- Page 23 and 24: 2 A doubling-adding method to inclu
- Page 25 and 26: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 27 and 28: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 29 and 30: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 31 and 32: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 33 and 34: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 35 and 36: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 37 and 38: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 39 and 40: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 41 and 42: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 43: A doubling-adding method to include
- Page 46 and 47: 40 Chapter 3 nm with a spectral res
- Page 48 and 49: 42 Chapter 3 contributions of lower
- Page 50 and 51: 44 Chapter 3 if we use the effectiv
- Page 52 and 53: 46 Chapter 3 This in turn results i
- Page 54 and 55: 48 Chapter 3 This may be shown in a
- Page 56 and 57: 50 Chapter 3 The forward and adjoin
- Page 58 and 59: 52 Chapter 3 Here, ∆ = diag [1, 1
- Page 60 and 61: 54 Chapter 3 Figure 3.3: Relative R
- Page 62 and 63: 56 Chapter 3 biases the simulation
- Page 64 and 65: 58 Chapter 3 3.4.2 Approximation me
- Page 68 and 69: 62 Chapter 3 3.5 Simulation of pola
- Page 70 and 71: 64 Chapter 3 Figure 3.10: Relative
- Page 72 and 73: 66 Chapter 3 dependence on the vert
- Page 74 and 75: 68 Chapter 3 Figure 3.13: Same as F
- Page 76 and 77: 70 Chapter 3 3.6 Summary A vector r
- Page 78 and 79: 72 Chapter 3 where λ is the wavele
- Page 80 and 81: 74 Chapter 3 where S l is the expan
- Page 82 and 83: 76 Chapter 3 3.C Appendix: Evaluati
- Page 85 and 86: 4 Accurate modeling of spectral fin
- Page 87 and 88: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 89 and 90: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 91 and 92: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 93 and 94: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 95 and 96: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 97 and 98: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 99 and 100: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 101 and 102: Accurate modeling of spectral fine-
- Page 103 and 104: 5 Retrieval of cloud properties fro
- Page 105 and 106: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 107 and 108: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 109 and 110: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 111 and 112: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 113 and 114: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 115 and 116: Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 117 and 118:
Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 119 and 120:
Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 121 and 122:
Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 123 and 124:
Retrieval of cloud properties from
- Page 125 and 126:
References Aben, I., F. Helderman,
- Page 127 and 128:
References 121 Ellery, A., D. Wynn-
- Page 129 and 130:
References 123 Lacis, A. A., J. Cho
- Page 131 and 132:
References 125 Schulz, F., K. Stamn
- Page 133 and 134:
Summary A spectrum of sunlight that
- Page 135 and 136:
Summary 129 Earth radiance spectrum
- Page 137 and 138:
Samenvatting Het door de aardatmosf
- Page 139 and 140:
Samenvatting 133 met een vector-mod
- Page 141:
List of publications Peer-reviewed